Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Magick & Occult Rituals
Alchemy Experiments
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="alpha centauri" data-source="post: 207971" data-attributes="member: 8464"><p>That is a new text or relatively new, so this is not really traditional. The author lived during and a little bit after WW2.</p><p>The author tried to decode alchemy and make it understandable.</p><p></p><p>The stone is mainly mentioned in magical text. So I would think, to mention magic is ok. But I know there is a lot of garbage.</p><p></p><p>But the most texts are encoded. I think they either didnt know themselves how to produce the stone and just tried to shove their weight around or they wanted to lead people astray. These are both not an honorable characteristics.</p><p></p><p>Or another reason could be, they said there are mistakes in the texts, because they knew they were wrong but wanted to be worship as great revealers.</p><p></p><p>Why write about something, whereby you intenfully want to distribute disinformation? You just shouldnt write about it. That would be better.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="alpha centauri, post: 207971, member: 8464"] That is a new text or relatively new, so this is not really traditional. The author lived during and a little bit after WW2. The author tried to decode alchemy and make it understandable. The stone is mainly mentioned in magical text. So I would think, to mention magic is ok. But I know there is a lot of garbage. But the most texts are encoded. I think they either didnt know themselves how to produce the stone and just tried to shove their weight around or they wanted to lead people astray. These are both not an honorable characteristics. Or another reason could be, they said there are mistakes in the texts, because they knew they were wrong but wanted to be worship as great revealers. Why write about something, whereby you intenfully want to distribute disinformation? You just shouldnt write about it. That would be better. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Magick & Occult Rituals
Alchemy Experiments
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top