Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Alien contact in next 20 years
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="BubbuClinton" data-source="post: 23882" data-attributes="member: 395"><p><strong>Re: Alien contact in next 20 years</strong></p><p></p><p>Zoomerz,</p><p></p><p>It appears you don't appricieate the theories of Velikovsky. It may have been possible you didn't grasp the point of my post. I know I am a little vague some times. My first point is that there is a whole branch of science that believes that Venus was not formed at the same time as the other planets in its current location. There is actually a well founded theory that Mars was a Moon of another planet that exploded. Many people believe that if there was other life in this solar system, it may have originated there. Those studying Ieptus postulate that the Dyson sphere there maybe the original origion of the Noah's Ark story. Who knows? It would be good to actually study the issue.</p><p></p><p>My other point was to note that NASA is not always forth coming with information. For instance, Cassini flew right by Ieptus and did a radar surveys of the sphere. However, to this data they have not released any of the information they have accuired. There have been numerous requests that they do so. Those looking into this believe it could be an artificial carbon based structure that would have a unique radar signature.</p><p></p><p> I used the Venus analogy to demonstrate NASA also is fond of releasing false information. Another good example is there false hoods is 50 years of JPL calling Mars red. I believe you have seen the series of photos relased by JPL and NASA always tinting Mars Red. It wasn't until Mars came so close to the Earth a few years ago and every amature photographer in the world noticed that it was not red. Gee, it is the color of Arizona. By changing the tint back on a lot of those pictures that JPL relased of the ground of Mars, you all of a sudden see green patches. I am not saying that these are the Holy Cows that we spoke of and you probably never read "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Heilien, so you don't "Grok" what I am speaking about. However, to suggest just because NASA or JPL says that you can't live on Venus, is kinda like saying there are WMDs in Iraq because G. W says there are. I am simply suggesting, that the Origions of Venus are in Question and we don't know the answer. I also recall that in the 50s and 60s before Mars was Red, the general scientific theory said that the Atmosphere on Mars was 1/10th of that of the Earth's. I recall science fiction movies into the 70's speculating about briething on Mars because it was like being on Mount Everest. It wasn't until the Late 70's when Mars turned Deep Red that it changed to 1/100th the atmospher and could not support life. I guess mass caculation formulas canged all of a sudden then. I simply do not believe on first glance everything coming out of NASA. I am frankly surpised you do. I know you father worked for NASA and so did mine. However, I remember my father talking about the atmospher on Mars when I am a kid. The math chaged after he left NASA. <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p><p></p><p>Now I realize that you are an extreme anti-semite and anti-christian by all of your prior posts. I was not attempting to prove or disprove the Bible. I was simply stating some of the positions of Velikovsky. He happened to have the veiw that some of the events in the Bible might be explainable by the capture of Venus into the solar system. Do I believe his theory? Well, there are modern astro-physists that are looking into to position. I don't believe that they follow his time line, but they give credency to the Venus being capture theory at the time that planet that Mars orbited blew up. It would be nice to have independent research about Venus other than NASA. Also it is posible that the atmospher on Venus may have been a lot different 10,000 years ago, who knows. I dont' really support god is an alien like you do anyway. I was just pointing out there is a posible theory there. Is it ridiculous? Without real information, it imposible to tell.</p><p></p><p>You suggest asking the Venusians. I have heard that women are Venusian, you can try asking them. They would probably just deny it anyway.</p><p></p><p>May God(Alien) bless you Zooomerz and keep you well.</p><p></p><p>Bubbu</p><p>__________________________________</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="BubbuClinton, post: 23882, member: 395"] [b]Re: Alien contact in next 20 years[/b] Zoomerz, It appears you don't appricieate the theories of Velikovsky. It may have been possible you didn't grasp the point of my post. I know I am a little vague some times. My first point is that there is a whole branch of science that believes that Venus was not formed at the same time as the other planets in its current location. There is actually a well founded theory that Mars was a Moon of another planet that exploded. Many people believe that if there was other life in this solar system, it may have originated there. Those studying Ieptus postulate that the Dyson sphere there maybe the original origion of the Noah's Ark story. Who knows? It would be good to actually study the issue. My other point was to note that NASA is not always forth coming with information. For instance, Cassini flew right by Ieptus and did a radar surveys of the sphere. However, to this data they have not released any of the information they have accuired. There have been numerous requests that they do so. Those looking into this believe it could be an artificial carbon based structure that would have a unique radar signature. I used the Venus analogy to demonstrate NASA also is fond of releasing false information. Another good example is there false hoods is 50 years of JPL calling Mars red. I believe you have seen the series of photos relased by JPL and NASA always tinting Mars Red. It wasn't until Mars came so close to the Earth a few years ago and every amature photographer in the world noticed that it was not red. Gee, it is the color of Arizona. By changing the tint back on a lot of those pictures that JPL relased of the ground of Mars, you all of a sudden see green patches. I am not saying that these are the Holy Cows that we spoke of and you probably never read "Stranger in a Strange Land" by Heilien, so you don't "Grok" what I am speaking about. However, to suggest just because NASA or JPL says that you can't live on Venus, is kinda like saying there are WMDs in Iraq because G. W says there are. I am simply suggesting, that the Origions of Venus are in Question and we don't know the answer. I also recall that in the 50s and 60s before Mars was Red, the general scientific theory said that the Atmosphere on Mars was 1/10th of that of the Earth's. I recall science fiction movies into the 70's speculating about briething on Mars because it was like being on Mount Everest. It wasn't until the Late 70's when Mars turned Deep Red that it changed to 1/100th the atmospher and could not support life. I guess mass caculation formulas canged all of a sudden then. I simply do not believe on first glance everything coming out of NASA. I am frankly surpised you do. I know you father worked for NASA and so did mine. However, I remember my father talking about the atmospher on Mars when I am a kid. The math chaged after he left NASA. :) Now I realize that you are an extreme anti-semite and anti-christian by all of your prior posts. I was not attempting to prove or disprove the Bible. I was simply stating some of the positions of Velikovsky. He happened to have the veiw that some of the events in the Bible might be explainable by the capture of Venus into the solar system. Do I believe his theory? Well, there are modern astro-physists that are looking into to position. I don't believe that they follow his time line, but they give credency to the Venus being capture theory at the time that planet that Mars orbited blew up. It would be nice to have independent research about Venus other than NASA. Also it is posible that the atmospher on Venus may have been a lot different 10,000 years ago, who knows. I dont' really support god is an alien like you do anyway. I was just pointing out there is a posible theory there. Is it ridiculous? Without real information, it imposible to tell. You suggest asking the Venusians. I have heard that women are Venusian, you can try asking them. They would probably just deny it anyway. May God(Alien) bless you Zooomerz and keep you well. Bubbu __________________________________ [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Aliens & UFOs
Alien contact in next 20 years
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top