Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. ANDREW NISSENBAUM
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Japrim" data-source="post: 122819" data-attributes="member: 7558"><p>Just to share, I would like to give an example of what I have been dealing with in regard to this whole Titor mess.</p><p></p><p>If anyone cares to review, there is a comment in the Titor posts where 'he' mentions the cover of an issue of Popular Mechanics. 'He' mentions how it describes how government is allowed to exploit law/CONstitution to spy on people, then mentions the back cover in reference to a hot tub.</p><p></p><p>What that is is a cryptic reference to a conversation I had years ago that influenced my thinking regarding certain things, as well as a point I have made in many political conversations, to include one early this morning right here on Paranormalis about how the 4th amendment allows for a violation of privacy and property rights.</p><p></p><p>Understand we are talking about two separate ideas and circumstances as it pertains to each(front and back) cover of a Popular Mechanics magazine.</p><p></p><p>Years ago (in Florida in 1998), I had a conversation where there was only one other person present, and relating to circumstance that stands out as unusual. It is not something that happens every day. A few years later, around the time Titor was posting on the internet, I was sitting in the 'privacy' of my living room sharing my experience of said conversation with my father.</p><p></p><p>That conversation is not one of those things that I mention too often, but do remember fairly well. Somehow it ended up in the Titor posts. What this means is that it must have originated from either:</p><p></p><p>A - One of two other people who were present for the original conversation.</p><p>B - My now deceased father who was living with me at the time the posts were made.</p><p>C - Someone who I have spoken to about it, and cannot remember.</p><p>D - Someone spying on my father and I.</p><p>E - Me</p><p></p><p>This means that John Titor can be identified as being from or related to a small number of people.</p><p></p><p>So lets apply deductive reasoning....</p><p></p><p>A - There is no reason to believe that it was either of the two people I was talking to. They have no motive or benefit of being involved. They can be found today, and their whereabouts over the last 18 years accounted for. I seriously doubt it is either of them. Hell, they may not even remember the conversation. Plus, there are many other things regarding this time travel stuff that those two people were not privy to. Thus I can safely and confidently say that it was not them.</p><p></p><p>B - My now deceased father. I knew where my father was for most of the time when he lived with me. Most of the time he was sitting on my couch or at work with a long time family friend, or with other family. He was with me almost every day for the duration of when the Titor posts were being made. He didn't fake his death and travel back in time to make reference to our conversation because family was present when he passed. His death is confirmed. Besides, we don't/didn't exactly agree politically. And the political arguments made were not of my espoused idealism until at least 2009, long after the Titor posts were made. That is to say that I was not conscious of such political idealism and arguments until recently. It wasn't dad that did it.</p><p></p><p>C - Someone who I have spoken to about it that I cannot remember. While it is entirely possible that I mentioned my conversation from Florida to a friend associate or coworker, etc., I likely wouldn't have bothered to mention certain unusual details, simply because it wasn't worth mentioning. I cannot definitively account for this, but it is unlikely someone would take a random conversation and insert it into the posts. And again, it would not account for certain things that either they were not privy to or originates from my mind in recent years.</p><p></p><p>D - Someone spying on me. Beginning around the time of the Titor posts, and continuing until recently, I have encountered a number of people who have gone out of their way to stalk me, to get close and personal to me, then relay or parrot things I have said in a presumed private setting. Much of that has been conversations between my father and I in the early 2000's. Some of it was information that I was not aware of until recent years.</p><p></p><p>(Hell, I wasn't even aware of the Titor posts until around 2006-2007)</p><p></p><p>E - Myself. This is entirely possible IF I am given access to time travel, and ONLY if I am given access to time travel. Because in order for it to be me, I must have been in two places at once mentioning unusual specific information privy to only a small select group of people.</p><p></p><p>Now, this is not the only example of this type of thing. The Secret Song works the same way, as well as a few other things that I will not mention at this time. What this suggests is that John Titor is either myself or someone who has been spying on me for so many years, or perhaps a combination of both. That is to say that it is possibly that if/when given time travel, that I will go back and post things to let myself know it is me, but that someone else will also post pretending to be me.</p><p></p><p>When considering that I have already caught certain parties doing exactly that, meaning that they have been stalking me and taking excerpts from private conversations as well as things I post on the net publicly, then inserting them into the posts before I said or wrote such things, ...it points to D being the most likely answer, that it is time traveling stalkers.</p><p></p><p>So, with all that being said, someone out there, go ahead and claim ownership of the Titor posts. Go ahead and claim to be John Titor. Please provide whatever proof that you are in fact John Titor. Then I will have identified my stalkers, those who have aggravated the shit out of me for at least the last 15 years, those who have gone out of their way to organize to violate me.</p><p></p><p>Show yourself, bitches. Please. Pretty pretty please, so that you can be dealt with appropriately. There is only one person whom I will forgive.</p><p></p><p>In addition to all that I have mentioned, one other possibility is that I will send people back in time with instruction on what to do and say that would account for these things. Otherwise, someones is fuking around, playing with fire, and will be burned eventually.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Japrim, post: 122819, member: 7558"] Just to share, I would like to give an example of what I have been dealing with in regard to this whole Titor mess. If anyone cares to review, there is a comment in the Titor posts where 'he' mentions the cover of an issue of Popular Mechanics. 'He' mentions how it describes how government is allowed to exploit law/CONstitution to spy on people, then mentions the back cover in reference to a hot tub. What that is is a cryptic reference to a conversation I had years ago that influenced my thinking regarding certain things, as well as a point I have made in many political conversations, to include one early this morning right here on Paranormalis about how the 4th amendment allows for a violation of privacy and property rights. Understand we are talking about two separate ideas and circumstances as it pertains to each(front and back) cover of a Popular Mechanics magazine. Years ago (in Florida in 1998), I had a conversation where there was only one other person present, and relating to circumstance that stands out as unusual. It is not something that happens every day. A few years later, around the time Titor was posting on the internet, I was sitting in the 'privacy' of my living room sharing my experience of said conversation with my father. That conversation is not one of those things that I mention too often, but do remember fairly well. Somehow it ended up in the Titor posts. What this means is that it must have originated from either: A - One of two other people who were present for the original conversation. B - My now deceased father who was living with me at the time the posts were made. C - Someone who I have spoken to about it, and cannot remember. D - Someone spying on my father and I. E - Me This means that John Titor can be identified as being from or related to a small number of people. So lets apply deductive reasoning.... A - There is no reason to believe that it was either of the two people I was talking to. They have no motive or benefit of being involved. They can be found today, and their whereabouts over the last 18 years accounted for. I seriously doubt it is either of them. Hell, they may not even remember the conversation. Plus, there are many other things regarding this time travel stuff that those two people were not privy to. Thus I can safely and confidently say that it was not them. B - My now deceased father. I knew where my father was for most of the time when he lived with me. Most of the time he was sitting on my couch or at work with a long time family friend, or with other family. He was with me almost every day for the duration of when the Titor posts were being made. He didn't fake his death and travel back in time to make reference to our conversation because family was present when he passed. His death is confirmed. Besides, we don't/didn't exactly agree politically. And the political arguments made were not of my espoused idealism until at least 2009, long after the Titor posts were made. That is to say that I was not conscious of such political idealism and arguments until recently. It wasn't dad that did it. C - Someone who I have spoken to about it that I cannot remember. While it is entirely possible that I mentioned my conversation from Florida to a friend associate or coworker, etc., I likely wouldn't have bothered to mention certain unusual details, simply because it wasn't worth mentioning. I cannot definitively account for this, but it is unlikely someone would take a random conversation and insert it into the posts. And again, it would not account for certain things that either they were not privy to or originates from my mind in recent years. D - Someone spying on me. Beginning around the time of the Titor posts, and continuing until recently, I have encountered a number of people who have gone out of their way to stalk me, to get close and personal to me, then relay or parrot things I have said in a presumed private setting. Much of that has been conversations between my father and I in the early 2000's. Some of it was information that I was not aware of until recent years. (Hell, I wasn't even aware of the Titor posts until around 2006-2007) E - Myself. This is entirely possible IF I am given access to time travel, and ONLY if I am given access to time travel. Because in order for it to be me, I must have been in two places at once mentioning unusual specific information privy to only a small select group of people. Now, this is not the only example of this type of thing. The Secret Song works the same way, as well as a few other things that I will not mention at this time. What this suggests is that John Titor is either myself or someone who has been spying on me for so many years, or perhaps a combination of both. That is to say that it is possibly that if/when given time travel, that I will go back and post things to let myself know it is me, but that someone else will also post pretending to be me. When considering that I have already caught certain parties doing exactly that, meaning that they have been stalking me and taking excerpts from private conversations as well as things I post on the net publicly, then inserting them into the posts before I said or wrote such things, ...it points to D being the most likely answer, that it is time traveling stalkers. So, with all that being said, someone out there, go ahead and claim ownership of the Titor posts. Go ahead and claim to be John Titor. Please provide whatever proof that you are in fact John Titor. Then I will have identified my stalkers, those who have aggravated the shit out of me for at least the last 15 years, those who have gone out of their way to organize to violate me. Show yourself, bitches. Please. Pretty pretty please, so that you can be dealt with appropriately. There is only one person whom I will forgive. In addition to all that I have mentioned, one other possibility is that I will send people back in time with instruction on what to do and say that would account for these things. Otherwise, someones is fuking around, playing with fire, and will be burned eventually. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
AN OPEN LETTER TO MR. ANDREW NISSENBAUM
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top