Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Another Stepping Stone
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Judge Bean" data-source="post: 15097" data-attributes="member: 42"><p><strong>Another Stepping Stone</strong></p><p></p><p>There's even more stuff lurking in the bill, and it will still be a long time before all of it gets opened up and understood. It looks like they took out the more blatant material so as not to compromise the underlying provisions meant to convert the system from a union of sovereign states to a centralized authority.</p><p></p><p>The old system was one of dual citizenship. Every person was a citizen of his State and, <em>by virtue of that</em>, of the United States as well. You could only be a citizen of the U.S. without State citizenship if your home was in a Federal District or Territory. The purpose of this is to ensure that rights and privileges guaranteed by one State would not reduce the rights or privileges of the citizen of another State; but the concept was clearly one under which an American was a compatriot of all other Americans despite living under different laws.</p><p></p><p>No more.</p><p></p><p>They are retrofitting the system to institute a single, omnipotent central command, and render the States quaint and obsolete. Statehood will have no more force or meaning than style of license plate or species of your State bird.</p><p></p><p>The push is on to make us all alike-- or so much alike as to extinguish dissent. Individual thought and belief, keyed to unpredictable and unaffiliated traits of personality and character, must be controlled by acquiring privacy for the use of the overall State.</p><p></p><p>There is no explicit Constitutional right to privacy, only the one "read into" the law by the Supreme Court in finding specific boundaries for government conduct in the realms of marriage and reproduction rights. With the right set of clowns, you can read them <em>out </em>of the Constitution in a single court opinion. This is the one I'm waiting for; but they have to get rid of OConnor and a couple of others first.</p><p></p><p>Americans have always presumed that they have the inviolable right to be whoever they choose to be, and to change it at will and whim. Too bad we never bothered to codify it into statute. The new law is the equivalent of making it illegal to decide to be someone new, and locks your children into a specific identity before they've even had a chance to choose the first one they want.</p><p></p><p><em>The thing you will probably hear being said is that those who are innocent of any wrongdoing, or who have clear consciences, have nothing to fear from the government (and all corporations of a certain size) knowing exactly who you and your children are. </em> Likewise, if you are not a criminal hiding contraband in your home, you should have no objection to your place being ransacked without a warrant by the police-- or the army. </p><p></p><p>If you haven't done anything wrong, why do you need a lawyer?</p><p></p><p>If you plead Not Guilty, you must be guilty.</p><p></p><p>If you would only behave and live your life as approximately like Laura Bush and her family live theirs, you wouldn't worry about being monitored or having so-called "privacy."</p><p></p><p>You should be satisfied with the identity bestowed on you by the government.</p><p></p><p>War is peace, according to the Ministry of Truth.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Judge Bean, post: 15097, member: 42"] [b]Another Stepping Stone[/b] There's even more stuff lurking in the bill, and it will still be a long time before all of it gets opened up and understood. It looks like they took out the more blatant material so as not to compromise the underlying provisions meant to convert the system from a union of sovereign states to a centralized authority. The old system was one of dual citizenship. Every person was a citizen of his State and, [i]by virtue of that[/i], of the United States as well. You could only be a citizen of the U.S. without State citizenship if your home was in a Federal District or Territory. The purpose of this is to ensure that rights and privileges guaranteed by one State would not reduce the rights or privileges of the citizen of another State; but the concept was clearly one under which an American was a compatriot of all other Americans despite living under different laws. No more. They are retrofitting the system to institute a single, omnipotent central command, and render the States quaint and obsolete. Statehood will have no more force or meaning than style of license plate or species of your State bird. The push is on to make us all alike-- or so much alike as to extinguish dissent. Individual thought and belief, keyed to unpredictable and unaffiliated traits of personality and character, must be controlled by acquiring privacy for the use of the overall State. There is no explicit Constitutional right to privacy, only the one "read into" the law by the Supreme Court in finding specific boundaries for government conduct in the realms of marriage and reproduction rights. With the right set of clowns, you can read them [i]out [/i]of the Constitution in a single court opinion. This is the one I'm waiting for; but they have to get rid of OConnor and a couple of others first. Americans have always presumed that they have the inviolable right to be whoever they choose to be, and to change it at will and whim. Too bad we never bothered to codify it into statute. The new law is the equivalent of making it illegal to decide to be someone new, and locks your children into a specific identity before they've even had a chance to choose the first one they want. [i]The thing you will probably hear being said is that those who are innocent of any wrongdoing, or who have clear consciences, have nothing to fear from the government (and all corporations of a certain size) knowing exactly who you and your children are. [/i] Likewise, if you are not a criminal hiding contraband in your home, you should have no objection to your place being ransacked without a warrant by the police-- or the army. If you haven't done anything wrong, why do you need a lawyer? If you plead Not Guilty, you must be guilty. If you would only behave and live your life as approximately like Laura Bush and her family live theirs, you wouldn't worry about being monitored or having so-called "privacy." You should be satisfied with the identity bestowed on you by the government. War is peace, according to the Ministry of Truth. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Another Stepping Stone
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top