Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Are We On the Path to Civil War?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dancho" data-source="post: 13993" data-attributes="member: 245"><p><strong>Are We On the Path to Civil War?</strong></p><p></p><p>This is from <a href="http://www.godlessamericans.com" target="_blank">http://www.godlessamericans.com</a> -- I wouldn't paste all</p><p>this but this is really a critical thing.</p><p></p><p>"THE CONSTITUTION RESTORATION ACT OF 2004</p><p></p><p>So, it's come to this. For 228 years, we have built and enjoyed a</p><p>country whose laws are determined by the consent of the governed after</p><p>throwing off the yoke of the 'divine right of kings' and</p><p>declaring freedom of religion. Now, we have a bill in the U.S. Senate</p><p>(S.2082) and an identical one in the House (H.R.3799) that proclaims</p><p>that no federal court action can proceed against a</p><p>government (federal, state or local) or official of government</p><p>"?by reason of that element's or officer's acknowledgment of God</p><p>as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government."</p><p></p><p>This must necessarily be interpreted as saying if a government or</p><p>official of government does something they claim to be "God's law",</p><p>the Supreme Court and federal courts have no</p><p>jurisdiction. Far, far from separating church and state, this means</p><p>that legislators and government officials can base their votes and</p><p>decisions on tenets of their personal religious beliefs</p><p>without fear of judicial interference. This opens the door to majority</p><p>rule religion without the 'check and balance' of a Constitutional</p><p>challenge under the principles of religious freedom.</p><p>Ultimately, Congress could disenfranchise atheists, gays, even</p><p>followers of other religions, based on the "god's law" of the god of</p><p>the current majority. The bills also provide that if any</p><p>Supreme Court or federal judge does claim jurisdiction over these</p><p>matters, that judge can be removed from the bench.</p><p></p><p>These acts also would provide another toe hold for Christian theocrats</p><p>in their campaign to define the United States as a Christian nation in</p><p>direct contradiction of the 'no litmus test' clause</p><p>and the First Amendment of the Constitution and of the Treaty of</p><p>Tripoli.</p><p></p><p>There's another provision that is seemingly obvious but must be there</p><p>for a purpose. Each act "Prohibits a court of the United States from</p><p>relying upon any law, policy, or other action of a</p><p>foreign state or international organization in interpreting and</p><p>applying the Constitution, other than the constitutional law and</p><p>English common law." This may be preparing the way for</p><p>restricting federal judges from referring to or relying on any</p><p>international law or ruling by the United Nations, for example. It is</p><p>a bad idea for Congress to attempt to restrict the courts with</p><p>respect to how they interpret the Constitution. An independent</p><p>judiciary is a key element of our government and these bills are</p><p>designed to encroach on that independence."</p><p></p><p>To begin additional research on what's behind these bills you may</p><p>start here:</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/ConstitutionRestorationAct.htm" target="_blank">http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Co...torationAct.htm</a></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dancho, post: 13993, member: 245"] [b]Are We On the Path to Civil War?[/b] This is from [url=http://www.godlessamericans.com]http://www.godlessamericans.com[/url] -- I wouldn't paste all this but this is really a critical thing. "THE CONSTITUTION RESTORATION ACT OF 2004 So, it's come to this. For 228 years, we have built and enjoyed a country whose laws are determined by the consent of the governed after throwing off the yoke of the 'divine right of kings' and declaring freedom of religion. Now, we have a bill in the U.S. Senate (S.2082) and an identical one in the House (H.R.3799) that proclaims that no federal court action can proceed against a government (federal, state or local) or official of government "?by reason of that element's or officer's acknowledgment of God as the sovereign source of law, liberty, or government." This must necessarily be interpreted as saying if a government or official of government does something they claim to be "God's law", the Supreme Court and federal courts have no jurisdiction. Far, far from separating church and state, this means that legislators and government officials can base their votes and decisions on tenets of their personal religious beliefs without fear of judicial interference. This opens the door to majority rule religion without the 'check and balance' of a Constitutional challenge under the principles of religious freedom. Ultimately, Congress could disenfranchise atheists, gays, even followers of other religions, based on the "god's law" of the god of the current majority. The bills also provide that if any Supreme Court or federal judge does claim jurisdiction over these matters, that judge can be removed from the bench. These acts also would provide another toe hold for Christian theocrats in their campaign to define the United States as a Christian nation in direct contradiction of the 'no litmus test' clause and the First Amendment of the Constitution and of the Treaty of Tripoli. There's another provision that is seemingly obvious but must be there for a purpose. Each act "Prohibits a court of the United States from relying upon any law, policy, or other action of a foreign state or international organization in interpreting and applying the Constitution, other than the constitutional law and English common law." This may be preparing the way for restricting federal judges from referring to or relying on any international law or ruling by the United Nations, for example. It is a bad idea for Congress to attempt to restrict the courts with respect to how they interpret the Constitution. An independent judiciary is a key element of our government and these bills are designed to encroach on that independence." To begin additional research on what's behind these bills you may start here: [url=http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/ConstitutionRestorationAct.htm]http://www.yuricareport.com/Dominionism/Co...torationAct.htm[/url] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Are We On the Path to Civil War?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top