Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
BG, Hollis test failed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sue" data-source="post: 92168" data-attributes="member: 6122"><p>"This was simply a good way to convey something trivial to a peer"...</p><p>Trivial meaning that it didn't need to be said in the first place?...</p><p></p><p>My position is: "as a new poster/reader to this website.. I am reading public posts as it has to do with time travel because it interests me. Anything i read on a public website in a "public" way is conveyed as something that is meant for "me" a regular plain ol' visitor reading a post that was meant for me to read..</p><p>When I post something here it is simply for "open" discussion from "anyone".. If I have a "specific" question or comment to someone "specific" = without public discussion then I will reserve that to personal email/their personal page or something other than a place that "anyone" can read and attempt to participate in a discussion "such is the reason for posting here specifically"...</p><p></p><p>My question was simple.. Why post a comment to someone you wanted to directly address and make public on a public thread that was open for anyone to read or interpret? why not just message them privately? that was my question..</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sue, post: 92168, member: 6122"] "This was simply a good way to convey something trivial to a peer"... Trivial meaning that it didn't need to be said in the first place?... My position is: "as a new poster/reader to this website.. I am reading public posts as it has to do with time travel because it interests me. Anything i read on a public website in a "public" way is conveyed as something that is meant for "me" a regular plain ol' visitor reading a post that was meant for me to read.. When I post something here it is simply for "open" discussion from "anyone".. If I have a "specific" question or comment to someone "specific" = without public discussion then I will reserve that to personal email/their personal page or something other than a place that "anyone" can read and attempt to participate in a discussion "such is the reason for posting here specifically"... My question was simple.. Why post a comment to someone you wanted to directly address and make public on a public thread that was open for anyone to read or interpret? why not just message them privately? that was my question.. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
BG, Hollis test failed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top