Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
BG, Hollis test failed
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="AAA" data-source="post: 92278" data-attributes="member: 5790"><p>Another thing is that it needs to be less ambiguous. ...as in absolutely clear and concise.</p><p></p><p>It is a somewhat personalized means that relies on implied or inferred logic using inductive and deductive reasoning, correlations and such.</p><p></p><p>I'll use this thread as an example.</p><p></p><p>Party A made a demand of party B in a context exclusive of Paranormalis. I see that it is a response.</p><p></p><p>" BG Hollis test failed " is saying 2 things;</p><p></p><p>1 - It is indicating the addressee</p><p>2 - It is explaining that something went wrong.</p><p></p><p>I have no idea what went wrong because I cannot understand the context. With no definitive frame of reference, It means very little other than the 2 above things cited.</p><p></p><p>" Sorry to cut right to it, but the test did not tie as hoped. I know you have at least two more options so please do not despair! "</p><p></p><p>This says;</p><p></p><p>1 - Indicates that it is from Party B or someone interfering between Parties A and B</p><p>2 - Something went wrong</p><p>3 - Stay hopeful</p><p></p><p>My response is;</p><p></p><p>What test? What went wrong? Hope for what? WTF are you talking about?</p><p></p><p>If party B knows what is going on, and knows who is involved, knows where to find Party A, and knows it is causing frustration, insanity and suffrage for Party A, and continues with it, then it is deliberate stalking, harassment, cruel and unusual torture, and a threat to the welfare of Party A.</p><p></p><p>...and thus justifies a response from Party A to identify Party B and kill it as a means of defense of Party A's welfare.</p><p></p><p>It is akin to someone locking you in a room, giving you a blank piece of paper with no writing utensil, and demanding you "write down the names of all of them", "describe it's color", and "add them up"</p><p></p><p>If you do not understand 'them' or 'it' or have a writing utensil, it is just someone locking you in a room and trying to piss you off. The appropriate response is to start killing people and breaking things.</p><p></p><p>CUT THE SHIT YOU SICK MUTHER FUCKERS!!!!! <--- This is an example of a clear and concise means of communication</p><p></p><p><img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="AAA, post: 92278, member: 5790"] Another thing is that it needs to be less ambiguous. ...as in absolutely clear and concise. It is a somewhat personalized means that relies on implied or inferred logic using inductive and deductive reasoning, correlations and such. I'll use this thread as an example. Party A made a demand of party B in a context exclusive of Paranormalis. I see that it is a response. " BG Hollis test failed " is saying 2 things; 1 - It is indicating the addressee 2 - It is explaining that something went wrong. I have no idea what went wrong because I cannot understand the context. With no definitive frame of reference, It means very little other than the 2 above things cited. " Sorry to cut right to it, but the test did not tie as hoped. I know you have at least two more options so please do not despair! " This says; 1 - Indicates that it is from Party B or someone interfering between Parties A and B 2 - Something went wrong 3 - Stay hopeful My response is; What test? What went wrong? Hope for what? WTF are you talking about? If party B knows what is going on, and knows who is involved, knows where to find Party A, and knows it is causing frustration, insanity and suffrage for Party A, and continues with it, then it is deliberate stalking, harassment, cruel and unusual torture, and a threat to the welfare of Party A. ...and thus justifies a response from Party A to identify Party B and kill it as a means of defense of Party A's welfare. It is akin to someone locking you in a room, giving you a blank piece of paper with no writing utensil, and demanding you "write down the names of all of them", "describe it's color", and "add them up" If you do not understand 'them' or 'it' or have a writing utensil, it is just someone locking you in a room and trying to piss you off. The appropriate response is to start killing people and breaking things. CUT THE SHIT YOU SICK MUTHER FUCKERS!!!!! <--- This is an example of a clear and concise means of communication :) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
BG, Hollis test failed
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top