Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Bill of Rights Defense Resolutions
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darkwolf" data-source="post: 14081" data-attributes="member: 177"><p><strong>Bill of Rights Defense Resolutions</strong></p><p></p><p>I would assume that the In the cities comment ment that the major metros were under tighter controll than the countryside was. This makes sense in that the feds, and or the UN don't have the manpower to keep a very tight leash on people across the entire landmass. People who are willing to put up with that will stay in the cities, buy the propaganda against the constitutionalists, and will be hostile tward them. The government would probably pull it's military and enforcement assets in to the cities in order to protect the metros, and to make sure that it's garrisons woulden't be isolated and overrun. Some cities may have signed the bill, but once it comes time to actually stand up to the feds, I'd expect the small towns to have more luck at it if alot of them do it.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darkwolf, post: 14081, member: 177"] [b]Bill of Rights Defense Resolutions[/b] I would assume that the In the cities comment ment that the major metros were under tighter controll than the countryside was. This makes sense in that the feds, and or the UN don't have the manpower to keep a very tight leash on people across the entire landmass. People who are willing to put up with that will stay in the cities, buy the propaganda against the constitutionalists, and will be hostile tward them. The government would probably pull it's military and enforcement assets in to the cities in order to protect the metros, and to make sure that it's garrisons woulden't be isolated and overrun. Some cities may have signed the bill, but once it comes time to actually stand up to the feds, I'd expect the small towns to have more luck at it if alot of them do it. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Bill of Rights Defense Resolutions
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top