Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Blinking Universe - 30 Technical Papers on Theory Applications
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 241042" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I've spent quite a few years using the scientific method myself. It's useless! I never invented anything with it. Haven't found any evidence that anyone else has done so either. I had to teach myself how to invent things. That information seems to just not exist. We are being misled and controlled into being stupid with the scientific method. Look at gravity probe B. Do you agree with what they did to the data? I don't! We were lied to to keep General Relativity alive. General Relativity falls flat on its face right from the start with the Equivalence Principle. Gravity is not an inertial force! Observations and experimental data prove that to be so. Yet we still have people claiming the Equivalence Principle is true. So you tell me how an object can have weight without acceleration. That would be because gravitational weight has that property. An object undergoing gravitational acceleration in vacuum is weightless. If you will notice both weight and acceleration vectors point in the same direction yet are 180 degrees temporally out of phase with each other. Not so with an inertial acceleration. The acceleration and weight vectors are opposed with an in phase relationship. So how is there any equivalence at all? There isn't! Yet we are still being educated with this bullshit theory as if it were true. I have to ask, is mankind in charge of its education? Or are we being controlled by the ET's to keep us all stupid.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 241042, member: 288"] I've spent quite a few years using the scientific method myself. It's useless! I never invented anything with it. Haven't found any evidence that anyone else has done so either. I had to teach myself how to invent things. That information seems to just not exist. We are being misled and controlled into being stupid with the scientific method. Look at gravity probe B. Do you agree with what they did to the data? I don't! We were lied to to keep General Relativity alive. General Relativity falls flat on its face right from the start with the Equivalence Principle. Gravity is not an inertial force! Observations and experimental data prove that to be so. Yet we still have people claiming the Equivalence Principle is true. So you tell me how an object can have weight without acceleration. That would be because gravitational weight has that property. An object undergoing gravitational acceleration in vacuum is weightless. If you will notice both weight and acceleration vectors point in the same direction yet are 180 degrees temporally out of phase with each other. Not so with an inertial acceleration. The acceleration and weight vectors are opposed with an in phase relationship. So how is there any equivalence at all? There isn't! Yet we are still being educated with this bullshit theory as if it were true. I have to ask, is mankind in charge of its education? Or are we being controlled by the ET's to keep us all stupid. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Blinking Universe - 30 Technical Papers on Theory Applications
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top