Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Computer Speed: Another John Titor prediction come true
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="outspoken" data-source="post: 75521" data-attributes="member: 4413"><p>Ive been reading John Titors posts, and arguments for and against him. One argument i havent not seen so far is based on this quote by John,</p><p></p><p>"</p><p><strong><u>What is the speed of the average computer in the future? </u></strong></p><p>GHz is not a useful measurement. Computers are no longer measured by their speed as much as the number of variables (not calculations) they can handle per second."</p><p></p><p>I think it was 2004 that dual core processors first appeared. Because a CPU's frequency is barely increasing, but its cores are, in recent years people have gotten away from judging a chip by its frequency (3.3ghz) and instead focused on the total computations the chip can do.</p><p></p><p>I work in IT and I remember 2000 well. Back in 2000 the average CPU speed was around 1ghz. It was many years until around the 2ghz level that speed slowly increased while the chips cores increased.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="outspoken, post: 75521, member: 4413"] Ive been reading John Titors posts, and arguments for and against him. One argument i havent not seen so far is based on this quote by John, " [B][U]What is the speed of the average computer in the future? [/U][/B] GHz is not a useful measurement. Computers are no longer measured by their speed as much as the number of variables (not calculations) they can handle per second." I think it was 2004 that dual core processors first appeared. Because a CPU's frequency is barely increasing, but its cores are, in recent years people have gotten away from judging a chip by its frequency (3.3ghz) and instead focused on the total computations the chip can do. I work in IT and I remember 2000 well. Back in 2000 the average CPU speed was around 1ghz. It was many years until around the 2ghz level that speed slowly increased while the chips cores increased. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Computer Speed: Another John Titor prediction come true
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top