Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 195363" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>First, space is anything but static. It twists and turns with the masses flying through it.</p><p>Second, what you call space here is actually spacetime. The energy you claim that space has comes from particles that generate various fields. All these fields carry energy, but that energy is at the lowest possible energy level for the fields to exist, which is why they call the energy of space "zero-point' energy.</p><p></p><p>Zero point energy is made up of both types of the ONLY energy anyone has ever experienced - kinetic and potential.</p><p>Now, if you pick a single point (assuming the universe is not continuous) and compare the energy level at that point to the energy level of the same point in the past (or the future,) there could be a difference in the sum of the energies carried in the fields I mentioned. But that's true of any kind of energy generated for any reason. A hot cup of coffee contains energy. A hour or so later (or earlier) that energy is no longer there. </p><p>I could go on with more examples of energy changes over time, but why? It's obvious the energy itself doesn't come from time, or go into time. So time doesn't have energy.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 195363, member: 443"] First, space is anything but static. It twists and turns with the masses flying through it. Second, what you call space here is actually spacetime. The energy you claim that space has comes from particles that generate various fields. All these fields carry energy, but that energy is at the lowest possible energy level for the fields to exist, which is why they call the energy of space "zero-point' energy. Zero point energy is made up of both types of the ONLY energy anyone has ever experienced - kinetic and potential. Now, if you pick a single point (assuming the universe is not continuous) and compare the energy level at that point to the energy level of the same point in the past (or the future,) there could be a difference in the sum of the energies carried in the fields I mentioned. But that's true of any kind of energy generated for any reason. A hot cup of coffee contains energy. A hour or so later (or earlier) that energy is no longer there. I could go on with more examples of energy changes over time, but why? It's obvious the energy itself doesn't come from time, or go into time. So time doesn't have energy. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top