Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T" data-source="post: 195439" data-attributes="member: 11605"><p>Hey [USER=443]@Harte[/USER] I wanted to ask you a question based on the first part of what you wrote above. You said & I quote...</p><p></p><p>"First, space is anything but static. It twists and turns with the masses flying through it.</p><p>Second, what you call space here is actually spacetime. The energy you claim that space has comes from particles that generate various fields. All these fields carry energy, but that energy is at the lowest possible energy level for the fields to exist, which is why they call the energy of space "zero-point' energy." </p><p></p><p>Now if what you wrote is true then somehow these various particle generated fields must cause and or give rise to what we know & experience as being spacial area. At the same time though & while the outbound expression and or emission of these various particle generated fields must combine together with time to cause the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime these various spacial causing particle generated fields themselves cannot be time. Because if they were the distribution of their outbound expression and or emission would dimensionally align with time and not at a right angle to time. Which in turn should mean that dimensionally these various spacial causing particle generated fields & time must be 2 very different things and as such dimensionally they must be something in their own selves. At the same time though the only way that these 2 very different dimensional things can cause and or become the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime is if both of them not only directly connect to each other dimensionally, but, as I'm sure you already know, this direct dimensional connection must be at a right angle to each other. Thereby giving these various spacial causing particle generated fields & time the ability to cause the simultaneous sideways and or right angle distribution of each other thereby causing and or becoming the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime. So now my question for you here is this. Being that time must directly connect at a right angle to these various particle generated fields do you know if Scientists think that time is some unknown kind of particle generated field or if they think it's something else?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T, post: 195439, member: 11605"] Hey [USER=443]@Harte[/USER] I wanted to ask you a question based on the first part of what you wrote above. You said & I quote... "First, space is anything but static. It twists and turns with the masses flying through it. Second, what you call space here is actually spacetime. The energy you claim that space has comes from particles that generate various fields. All these fields carry energy, but that energy is at the lowest possible energy level for the fields to exist, which is why they call the energy of space "zero-point' energy." Now if what you wrote is true then somehow these various particle generated fields must cause and or give rise to what we know & experience as being spacial area. At the same time though & while the outbound expression and or emission of these various particle generated fields must combine together with time to cause the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime these various spacial causing particle generated fields themselves cannot be time. Because if they were the distribution of their outbound expression and or emission would dimensionally align with time and not at a right angle to time. Which in turn should mean that dimensionally these various spacial causing particle generated fields & time must be 2 very different things and as such dimensionally they must be something in their own selves. At the same time though the only way that these 2 very different dimensional things can cause and or become the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime is if both of them not only directly connect to each other dimensionally, but, as I'm sure you already know, this direct dimensional connection must be at a right angle to each other. Thereby giving these various spacial causing particle generated fields & time the ability to cause the simultaneous sideways and or right angle distribution of each other thereby causing and or becoming the 2 dimensional area known as spacetime. So now my question for you here is this. Being that time must directly connect at a right angle to these various particle generated fields do you know if Scientists think that time is some unknown kind of particle generated field or if they think it's something else? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top