Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T" data-source="post: 195541" data-attributes="member: 11605"><p>Hey [USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER] I wanted to run something by you based on the bottom part of what you posted above. However at first it might seem like what I'm about to say is in opposition to what you're saying, but it's not, I promise you.</p><p></p><p>So now if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time then under the terms of dimensional physics time by its very nature causes the 'distribution' of the actions & the changes in actions of things across itself. Which means that if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time or instance & if the source of an object's change in action comes from its inside or from its outside then that object is going to maintain its present action across time until it comes to the source of its change in action in time. At the same time though if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time or instance & if the source of an object's change in action comes from its inside or from its outside then that object is going to continue changing its action across time until it comes to the moment in time that this source stops causing and or applying change. In fact it is of my belief that this is why in mathematics it's always 'Change /(across or over) Time'. Even frequency of vibration or oscillation is the distribution of cyclic change /(over) time.</p><p></p><p>You see TimeFlipper, just like you, I believe that time is a kind of sequencer. The thing here though is that I believe this sequencing requires the use of distribution, which by its very nature is not only dimensional but it is also directional. In turn it is because of this I believe that the only way to properly explain time as a sequencer is to use the dimensional physics of the distribution of time. In fact while I was writing this reply I came up with a wild and crazy idea about spacial volume & time. What if spacial volume isn't what we think it is and or experience it to be?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T, post: 195541, member: 11605"] Hey [USER=6456]@TimeFlipper[/USER] I wanted to run something by you based on the bottom part of what you posted above. However at first it might seem like what I'm about to say is in opposition to what you're saying, but it's not, I promise you. So now if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time then under the terms of dimensional physics time by its very nature causes the 'distribution' of the actions & the changes in actions of things across itself. Which means that if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time or instance & if the source of an object's change in action comes from its inside or from its outside then that object is going to maintain its present action across time until it comes to the source of its change in action in time. At the same time though if time is a "sequencer" which prevents everything in our universe from happening all at the exact same time or instance & if the source of an object's change in action comes from its inside or from its outside then that object is going to continue changing its action across time until it comes to the moment in time that this source stops causing and or applying change. In fact it is of my belief that this is why in mathematics it's always 'Change /(across or over) Time'. Even frequency of vibration or oscillation is the distribution of cyclic change /(over) time. You see TimeFlipper, just like you, I believe that time is a kind of sequencer. The thing here though is that I believe this sequencing requires the use of distribution, which by its very nature is not only dimensional but it is also directional. In turn it is because of this I believe that the only way to properly explain time as a sequencer is to use the dimensional physics of the distribution of time. In fact while I was writing this reply I came up with a wild and crazy idea about spacial volume & time. What if spacial volume isn't what we think it is and or experience it to be? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Conversation
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top