Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Damage Debunkers Do
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HDRKID" data-source="post: 85487" data-attributes="member: 43"><p>Damage debunkers do is severe.</p><p></p><p>For example, Jimmy Savile was able to abuse children for over 50 years. He never went to prison. Debunkers claimed it was ugly rumors. He destroyed approx 500 young ones.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline" target="_blank"> Jimmy Savile: timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering | Media | theguardian.com </a></p><p></p><p>Debunkers often say things like "Where is the evidence? If it were true he would be in prison. The story would be on every newspaper.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline" target="_blank"> Jimmy Savile: timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering | Media | theguardian.com </a></p><p></p><p>Truth is that nasty debunkers use ridicule to silence innocent victims and the abuse goes on. Skeptics claim that you need extraordinary evidence to make extraordinary claims and prefer to maintain the status quo. Most of them think that if they giggle and scream HOAX! Problems go away.</p><p></p><p></p><p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile" target="_blank">Jimmy Savile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia</a></p><p></p><p>TAKEN FROM <a href="http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28027244" target="_blank">BBC News - Jimmy Savile NHS hospital abuse reports to be published</a></p><p></p><p><em>A report issued at the same time into the actions of the Crown Prosecution Service concluded that Savile could have been prosecuted in 2009, if prosecutors had taken the victims' claims more seriously.</em></p><p></p><p>Debunkers like to ridicule others and claim they are crazy. </p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]dlsp6B5ChDU[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HDRKID, post: 85487, member: 43"] Damage debunkers do is severe. For example, Jimmy Savile was able to abuse children for over 50 years. He never went to prison. Debunkers claimed it was ugly rumors. He destroyed approx 500 young ones. [url="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline"] Jimmy Savile: timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering | Media | theguardian.com [/url] Debunkers often say things like "Where is the evidence? If it were true he would be in prison. The story would be on every newspaper. [url="http://www.theguardian.com/media/2014/jun/26/jimmy-savile-sexual-abuse-timeline"] Jimmy Savile: timeline of his sexual abuse and its uncovering | Media | theguardian.com [/url] Truth is that nasty debunkers use ridicule to silence innocent victims and the abuse goes on. Skeptics claim that you need extraordinary evidence to make extraordinary claims and prefer to maintain the status quo. Most of them think that if they giggle and scream HOAX! Problems go away. [url="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jimmy_Savile"]Jimmy Savile - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia[/url] TAKEN FROM [url="http://www.bbc.com/news/uk-28027244"]BBC News - Jimmy Savile NHS hospital abuse reports to be published[/url] [I]A report issued at the same time into the actions of the Crown Prosecution Service concluded that Savile could have been prosecuted in 2009, if prosecutors had taken the victims' claims more seriously.[/I] [I][/I] Debunkers like to ridicule others and claim they are crazy. [MEDIA=youtube]dlsp6B5ChDU[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Damage Debunkers Do
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top