Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Debate : Science VS Spirituality
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NaturalPhilosopher" data-source="post: 167387" data-attributes="member: 9562"><p>good thoughts. Yeah i know it's like people take subjects way too seriously to consider new slants.</p><p></p><p>mainly what I've witnessed is people feel there is deception everywhere all the time so only extremely precise thoughts are accurate which is the scam. Most who do that don't believe reality formed from anything intentional. Pure randomness. On that case they feel there's no way to find anything of significance without serious work. I highly disagree.</p><p></p><p>Natural philosophy(my name) is a branch of victorian era thought that suggests rather than trying to discover something out of random creation you rather discover what was already created intentionally by someone. Much easier and makes discovery a hellva lot more efficient.</p><p></p><p>That's why skeptics reject simplicity in all things.</p><p>They believe anything not complex is not real.</p><p></p><p>History shows us the opposite, Faraday discovered moving a magnet over a wire attached to gold foil would make it move. Simple.</p><p>Wright brothers studied birds.</p><p>Natural gas was seen burning from holes in the ground.</p><p>Physics formed by Newton watching planets.</p><p>Darwin studied fossils and animals.</p><p></p><p>Darwin never suggested where the first life formed. Just said life can change. Like a giant misnomer. Human dna is the most complex molecule in existence. Obviously forming from chemicals even physicists say there's not enough time for the molecule to form random chance in 14billion years. They're right. More than enough time for it to change a bit after it had formed from another cause tho.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NaturalPhilosopher, post: 167387, member: 9562"] good thoughts. Yeah i know it's like people take subjects way too seriously to consider new slants. mainly what I've witnessed is people feel there is deception everywhere all the time so only extremely precise thoughts are accurate which is the scam. Most who do that don't believe reality formed from anything intentional. Pure randomness. On that case they feel there's no way to find anything of significance without serious work. I highly disagree. Natural philosophy(my name) is a branch of victorian era thought that suggests rather than trying to discover something out of random creation you rather discover what was already created intentionally by someone. Much easier and makes discovery a hellva lot more efficient. That's why skeptics reject simplicity in all things. They believe anything not complex is not real. History shows us the opposite, Faraday discovered moving a magnet over a wire attached to gold foil would make it move. Simple. Wright brothers studied birds. Natural gas was seen burning from holes in the ground. Physics formed by Newton watching planets. Darwin studied fossils and animals. Darwin never suggested where the first life formed. Just said life can change. Like a giant misnomer. Human dna is the most complex molecule in existence. Obviously forming from chemicals even physicists say there's not enough time for the molecule to form random chance in 14billion years. They're right. More than enough time for it to change a bit after it had formed from another cause tho. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Debate : Science VS Spirituality
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top