Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
- Debunking - I Am John Titor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Grayson" data-source="post: 43907" data-attributes="member: 18"><p>No, I haven't. Relative angular momentum is the fish you are looking for here. Some even describe the effect as relative rotational momentum. It's a conserved vector that can used to describe the overall effects of a physical system... like you are alleging here. L = r X p = r X <em>m</em>v for the spin on axis (simplified) and H2/1 = r X <em>m</em><span style="font-size: 10px">2</span>V for the relative movement of a body around a central body (simplified). In astrodynamics that would be h = H<span style="font-size: 10px">2/1</span>/m<span style="font-size: 10px">2</span>. All of which where r is the orbital position vector, v is the orbital velocity vector, <em>m</em><span style="font-size: 10px">2</span> is the mass of the orbiting body and where the mass is perpendicular to the orbiting plane h becomes the specific relative angular momentum. No, I haven't forgotten the maths involved.</p><p></p><p>It would be appropriate to state that masses in the outer system suffer from ever increasing orbital radii, but they do not pick up velocity as they do so and would fall out system rather than in system due to the pressure of the solar wind against their relatively light bodies. It is the speed of an orbit that wishes to spin a planetary body into space and the mass of a relative major body that drags it back in and sustains the orbital speed. Take away the relative major local mass and you lose velocity from any orbital body. To fall in system, they would need a fairly substantial velocity to counter their elemental structure. At the time you suggest that this would have happened, the lighter elemental planetismals where all falling out system as I have described previously. I have simplified this to the point where my head aches.</p><p></p><p>It couldn't have happened once Jupiter had stabilised its Moons orbits... as they were all stable. And it couldn't have happened one million years after Thea struck the Earth as all the lighter planetary bodies were moving closer to the positions that we see their ancestors in today.</p><p></p><p>All that notwithstanding, there isn't a chance in hell that phytoplankton had formed on the surface of Nortal as it was missing all the complex molecules in its makeup to allow phytoplankton to form.</p><p></p><p>Don't dance in this minefield fella.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Grayson, post: 43907, member: 18"] No, I haven't. Relative angular momentum is the fish you are looking for here. Some even describe the effect as relative rotational momentum. It's a conserved vector that can used to describe the overall effects of a physical system... like you are alleging here. L = r X p = r X [I]m[/I]v for the spin on axis (simplified) and H2/1 = r X [I]m[/I][SIZE=2]2[/SIZE]V for the relative movement of a body around a central body (simplified). In astrodynamics that would be h = H[SIZE=2]2/1[/SIZE]/m[SIZE=2]2[/SIZE]. All of which where r is the orbital position vector, v is the orbital velocity vector, [I]m[/I][SIZE=2]2[/SIZE] is the mass of the orbiting body and where the mass is perpendicular to the orbiting plane h becomes the specific relative angular momentum. No, I haven't forgotten the maths involved. It would be appropriate to state that masses in the outer system suffer from ever increasing orbital radii, but they do not pick up velocity as they do so and would fall out system rather than in system due to the pressure of the solar wind against their relatively light bodies. It is the speed of an orbit that wishes to spin a planetary body into space and the mass of a relative major body that drags it back in and sustains the orbital speed. Take away the relative major local mass and you lose velocity from any orbital body. To fall in system, they would need a fairly substantial velocity to counter their elemental structure. At the time you suggest that this would have happened, the lighter elemental planetismals where all falling out system as I have described previously. I have simplified this to the point where my head aches. It couldn't have happened once Jupiter had stabilised its Moons orbits... as they were all stable. And it couldn't have happened one million years after Thea struck the Earth as all the lighter planetary bodies were moving closer to the positions that we see their ancestors in today. All that notwithstanding, there isn't a chance in hell that phytoplankton had formed on the surface of Nortal as it was missing all the complex molecules in its makeup to allow phytoplankton to form. Don't dance in this minefield fella. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
- Debunking - I Am John Titor
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top