-
Do You Think Out of Place Objects Are Evidence of Time Travel?
- Thread starter TTZack
- Start date
The part of the tulli papyrus I thought was so interesting, was the part where they were confused in their hearts and laid on their bellies when the disc went toward the king's house.
It sounds like it is saying that they mistook it for a god and bowed to it. It demonstrates the perception of the author being that they knew the difference when writing. If the scribe knew the difference, it suggests they knew what was in the disk was not actually a god. It suggests they knew something about what it was, which is indicative of at least some level of interaction.
It suggests they were hanging out with whatever was flying around and took note that it was mistaken for a god.
... ... Afterthought:
It uses the word for heart in the context of emotional response to the flying disc. Because they laid on their belly, I presume that emotion was fear. It is as if the scribe is noting them mistaking the friendly disc piloting beings as something to be scared of.
It is still in the context of interaction with familiar friendly beings coming to visit the king. It is indicative that they were communicating and organizing, collaborating.
This would explain things like great big power sources/capacitors/batteries along the Nile that defy any previously known construction/engineering capability or methods, or that rivals or exceeds the modern.
If someone were using future tech with a low battery and a lot of man-power as a means of building a battery charger, trying to charge a time machine, it would also explain why there are pictures of helicopters and what appears to be spacecraft of sorts on ancient Egyptian walls (Abydos and Karnak).
Maybe the open knowledge and logging of the experience, the pyramids themselves, was a time capsule type message left for people in the future to find. Maybe it was a landing point for a future time travel expedition.
Who knows?Last edited:The Mayans were able to track the position of the planets and sun in our solar system, not only in relation to each other, but also in relation to the galactic equator over a 3600 year cycle, accurate to within seconds.
Carefully consider this;
Ancient cultures were dependent upon successful agriculture, which required they pay attention to time as it related to the seasons, which is dependent upon the circumstances and conditions of the Earth's behavior in space. It is entirely perceivable how an ancient culture would have noticed a few patterns over time.
They knew that when this or that gets to that position in the sky, warmth and rain was to follow, that it was time to plant in preparation for food stocks next winter. Their survival depended on it, so they were paying attention.
They were able to track the position of the solar system relative to the galactic equator over a 3600 year cycle. How and what would that kind of knowledge require?
In order to recognize it as a cycle or pattern, it would have had to have been monitored for several cycles. After that, it would have to be tracked and logged through each cycle, evolving and refining each time to eventually produce knowledge of the galactic equator as it relates to the rest of the galaxy and universe.
That would take a LONG time to develop such knowledge, perhaps hundreds of thousands of years of a civilization studying the sky. This suggests that the Mayan culture goes back much further, or they were much more advanced, than we currently understand.
It could suggest that they were given knowledge to develop from, a boost of sorts, by someone who already knew about said cycle.An out of place object in and of itself is not the actual evidence. The objects are the medium, while the actual proof is the information contained within. It is the information, the knowledge, that is out of place.
Physical objects are only one medium. What makes them special is that they are static, information frozen out of place.
Other mediums are intangible, transient and fleeting, dependent upon events and circumstances. A good example would be a stranger verbally telling you exactly who was going to win a championship sporting event the following day, and exactly how the game was going to happen. You have no proof to show anyone. But it was proven to you through out of place information.
