Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Does anyone have info that could possibly revive John and prove he isn't a complete hoax?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JimmyD" data-source="post: 163081" data-attributes="member: 9832"><p>(I made a thread titled "AUTHENTICITY" to demonstrate the difficulty imposed by people messing around with the posts where I explained some of this.)</p><p></p><p>It's not just simply an author making up a realistic scenario with realistic characters. It is pointing things out, specifics, using points of reference, logic and context, etc.</p><p></p><p>I will try to give an example without divulging too much. See this:</p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]6808[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p></p><p>Compare that to all the other copies from people claiming to know all about it. You will find that most differ and are incomplete from the above picture. There are no such people as John Titor or Vanessa Bunn. But their names do have meaning. If you care to notice, many of the claimed authentic posts are omitting Vanessa Bunn and her other posts.</p><p></p><p>Why? I posit that it is to remove information necessary for interpreting the author's cryptic referencing. Why do that?</p><p></p><p>When I found the above, I recognized things as cryptic. I thought; "that looks like it means this or that, and those might mean the other thing, etc." ...Then I went digging to see. And indeed I found something.</p><p></p><p>I found this:</p><p></p><p></p><p>[ATTACH=full]6810[/ATTACH] </p><p></p><p></p><p>That is the distance between two points. It is also a cryptic/hidden message and evidence of time travel. It is a demonstration of foreknowledge of events and circumstances frozen in time. ...and especially when combined with the above conversation between Titor and Vanessa, and a few other things like it that are also related. It all fits together like a nice neat little connect the dots type puzzle.</p><p></p><p>...except when people mess with the dots, when things are moved around, altered, omitted, and attached to a bunch of lies and manipulation, etc.</p><p></p><p>I am not sure the term "hoax" is applicable.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JimmyD, post: 163081, member: 9832"] (I made a thread titled "AUTHENTICITY" to demonstrate the difficulty imposed by people messing around with the posts where I explained some of this.) It's not just simply an author making up a realistic scenario with realistic characters. It is pointing things out, specifics, using points of reference, logic and context, etc. I will try to give an example without divulging too much. See this: [ATTACH=full]6808[/ATTACH] Compare that to all the other copies from people claiming to know all about it. You will find that most differ and are incomplete from the above picture. There are no such people as John Titor or Vanessa Bunn. But their names do have meaning. If you care to notice, many of the claimed authentic posts are omitting Vanessa Bunn and her other posts. Why? I posit that it is to remove information necessary for interpreting the author's cryptic referencing. Why do that? When I found the above, I recognized things as cryptic. I thought; "that looks like it means this or that, and those might mean the other thing, etc." ...Then I went digging to see. And indeed I found something. I found this: [ATTACH=full]6810[/ATTACH] That is the distance between two points. It is also a cryptic/hidden message and evidence of time travel. It is a demonstration of foreknowledge of events and circumstances frozen in time. ...and especially when combined with the above conversation between Titor and Vanessa, and a few other things like it that are also related. It all fits together like a nice neat little connect the dots type puzzle. ...except when people mess with the dots, when things are moved around, altered, omitted, and attached to a bunch of lies and manipulation, etc. I am not sure the term "hoax" is applicable. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Does anyone have info that could possibly revive John and prove he isn't a complete hoax?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top