Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 86939" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>Thank you for asking Opmur.</p><p> </p><p>I fear I'm about to be banned for providing an opposing view in a thread not tagged as "debate."</p><p> </p><p>Look, I probably shouldn't say this, but if opposing views, or evidence that indicates someone's view is simply wrong, must appear in a seperate "debunk" thread, then how is a discussion to take place?</p><p> </p><p>Wouldn't that result in every thread (except the debate threads) being filled with nothing but concurring viewpoints?</p><p>The example I always use is a room full of bobblehead dolls right after a small earthquake - everyone nodding at each other.</p><p> </p><p>I know the rules of this site, they caused me to leave once before. I feel like I'm skating on thin ice when I point out that Doreal's are not the authentic emrald tablets. I posted that (and a couple of other facts at this site) anyway because I don't like the idea of people being utterly ignorant on a subject then reading a thread and thinking they learned something, when in fact are just still ignorant on the matter.</p><p> </p><p>I understand that people don't like their ideas shot down by the light of reality. As an educator myself, I know that education is a painful process.</p><p> </p><p>But I maintain that, if one wants to discuss the paranormal, it is important to cull out the provably false claims from the unexplained ones. That way, one is actually conversing on the subject, and not on the frauds.</p><p> </p><p>However, this is not my site, and obviously the site owner can do things whatever way he wants. I fully understand the strictures placed on debate here - the site had only three or four regular posters not that long ago (I was one of them.) Traffic is important to any website, and if I run off all the fringies, traffic here would drop back down to unacceptable levels.</p><p> </p><p>On the other hand, anyone that reads this thread now knows about the REAL "Emerald Tablet of Thoth" and I think that is a good thing for paranormal discussions.</p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 86939, member: 443"] Thank you for asking Opmur. I fear I'm about to be banned for providing an opposing view in a thread not tagged as "debate." Look, I probably shouldn't say this, but if opposing views, or evidence that indicates someone's view is simply wrong, must appear in a seperate "debunk" thread, then how is a discussion to take place? Wouldn't that result in every thread (except the debate threads) being filled with nothing but concurring viewpoints? The example I always use is a room full of bobblehead dolls right after a small earthquake - everyone nodding at each other. I know the rules of this site, they caused me to leave once before. I feel like I'm skating on thin ice when I point out that Doreal's are not the authentic emrald tablets. I posted that (and a couple of other facts at this site) anyway because I don't like the idea of people being utterly ignorant on a subject then reading a thread and thinking they learned something, when in fact are just still ignorant on the matter. I understand that people don't like their ideas shot down by the light of reality. As an educator myself, I know that education is a painful process. But I maintain that, if one wants to discuss the paranormal, it is important to cull out the provably false claims from the unexplained ones. That way, one is actually conversing on the subject, and not on the frauds. However, this is not my site, and obviously the site owner can do things whatever way he wants. I fully understand the strictures placed on debate here - the site had only three or four regular posters not that long ago (I was one of them.) Traffic is important to any website, and if I run off all the fringies, traffic here would drop back down to unacceptable levels. On the other hand, anyone that reads this thread now knows about the REAL "Emerald Tablet of Thoth" and I think that is a good thing for paranormal discussions. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Emerald Tablets of Thoth the Atlantean
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top