Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Evidence supporting Gibbs's time machine?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Einstein" data-source="post: 59628" data-attributes="member: 288"><p>I can shed some light on what is happening with the timepiece. You see when I originally saw this video years ago I dismissed it as a magnetic effect on a mechanical watch. And up until recently I was satisfied with my reasoning. But my reasoning was based on assumptions at the time I made them. Now I have real facts about what is going on. The watch in the video is a battery operated quartz movement type. There is a property of quartz that is fact. Either a mechanical or electrical force applied to quartz will cause it to emit a voltage. Quartz is not electrically conductive. It appears to be immune from magnetic forces. But I suspect that the quartz crystal in the watch is being affected somehow. Just recently I realized that the Lorentz force is actually a mechanical repulsion force. Or anti-gravity which also behaves as centrifugal force. So if a mechanical force is present, it would affect the quartz crystal in the watch. Looking at the electromagnet in the HDR I see that it is being fed pulsating DC current. That creates a moving magnetic field that is present when the HDR is on. A moving magnetic field will create the Lorentz force which my experiments do suggest is equivalent to anti-gravity. So there is a mechanical force present acting on the quartz crystal. 60 times a second that quartz crystal in the watch is being hammered by the Lorentz force. So rather than a pulse of one times a second from the crystal, a pulse of 60 times a second comes from the crystal and is sent to the actuator in the watch mechanism that makes the hands move. Now this is just a theory, but it is based on facts.</p><p> </p><p>As for the HDR being a time machine? It is almost a time machine. It is one component shy of being a real time machine. Let me explain my reasoning just a bit. It is a fact that time flows at a slower rate within a gravity field. The HDR electromagnet produces the Lorentz force which I believe is the anti-gravity force. So the HDR electromagnet is producing a very weak anti-gravity field. The flow of time should be slightly faster within this field. Now if something were to affect this field by modulating it in an increasing or decreasing direction the force of time is accessed and motion through time would occur at a different rate. But does it work As Steven Gibbs states. I believe it does. Steven gives specific directions on how to use the HDR to time travel. The missing component is that you have to be over a naturally occurring grid point. Those grid points are like spinning vortexes. They are real. You just have to find one. Although I don't agree with Steven that those grid points are as plentiful as he would have you believe. Or as easy to find as he suggests. But he does say using an AM radio tuned to a strong station should help you locate one. When the station fades out as you walk with it, does indicate you are over a grid point. But the AM radio will also fade out just by changing the orientation of the radio. So I suspect if all orientations are tried and no reception, then you have succeeded. Also false readings within a building can fool you into believing you are over a grid point. Many homes and buildings have metal mesh under the plaster which could be affecting the AM radio reception.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Einstein, post: 59628, member: 288"] I can shed some light on what is happening with the timepiece. You see when I originally saw this video years ago I dismissed it as a magnetic effect on a mechanical watch. And up until recently I was satisfied with my reasoning. But my reasoning was based on assumptions at the time I made them. Now I have real facts about what is going on. The watch in the video is a battery operated quartz movement type. There is a property of quartz that is fact. Either a mechanical or electrical force applied to quartz will cause it to emit a voltage. Quartz is not electrically conductive. It appears to be immune from magnetic forces. But I suspect that the quartz crystal in the watch is being affected somehow. Just recently I realized that the Lorentz force is actually a mechanical repulsion force. Or anti-gravity which also behaves as centrifugal force. So if a mechanical force is present, it would affect the quartz crystal in the watch. Looking at the electromagnet in the HDR I see that it is being fed pulsating DC current. That creates a moving magnetic field that is present when the HDR is on. A moving magnetic field will create the Lorentz force which my experiments do suggest is equivalent to anti-gravity. So there is a mechanical force present acting on the quartz crystal. 60 times a second that quartz crystal in the watch is being hammered by the Lorentz force. So rather than a pulse of one times a second from the crystal, a pulse of 60 times a second comes from the crystal and is sent to the actuator in the watch mechanism that makes the hands move. Now this is just a theory, but it is based on facts. As for the HDR being a time machine? It is almost a time machine. It is one component shy of being a real time machine. Let me explain my reasoning just a bit. It is a fact that time flows at a slower rate within a gravity field. The HDR electromagnet produces the Lorentz force which I believe is the anti-gravity force. So the HDR electromagnet is producing a very weak anti-gravity field. The flow of time should be slightly faster within this field. Now if something were to affect this field by modulating it in an increasing or decreasing direction the force of time is accessed and motion through time would occur at a different rate. But does it work As Steven Gibbs states. I believe it does. Steven gives specific directions on how to use the HDR to time travel. The missing component is that you have to be over a naturally occurring grid point. Those grid points are like spinning vortexes. They are real. You just have to find one. Although I don't agree with Steven that those grid points are as plentiful as he would have you believe. Or as easy to find as he suggests. But he does say using an AM radio tuned to a strong station should help you locate one. When the station fades out as you walk with it, does indicate you are over a grid point. But the AM radio will also fade out just by changing the orientation of the radio. So I suspect if all orientations are tried and no reception, then you have succeeded. Also false readings within a building can fool you into believing you are over a grid point. Many homes and buildings have metal mesh under the plaster which could be affecting the AM radio reception. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Machines & Experiments
Evidence supporting Gibbs's time machine?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top