Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
1
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Exceptions in Scientific Laws?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="start at edge" data-source="post: 195420" data-attributes="member: 11971"><p>I got the idea now.</p><p>Yes, what you said is absolutely true – “that something can APPEAR to always happen” but when that other chance emerges, even if very tiny, it changes “always” to “sometimes”.</p><p>The examples are many:</p><p>One could say that every time he turns the switch on, there is light in his room … but what if the bulb is fried or the electricity cut off – then “sometimes” the light doesn’t go on when he turns the switch.</p><p>Also, one could say that there is no way the sun will not rise the next morning because that would mean the earth stopped rotating or the sun vanished, which is most unlikely to happen … what if he dies in his sleep – the sun will not rise FOR HIM anymore, bringing this out of causality aspect and putting it into relativity.</p><p>It is also true what you said about certain conditions that determine completely different outcomes of some processes, depending of the nature of that condition or by it occurring or not. In most cases, even scientific processes are not doubted to happen but rather WHY they happen as they do.</p><p>The physics and the math that we have at hand right now, doesn’t exclude in any way time reversal for example … and when math proves something, I for one completely trust it. In certain conditions and under certain circumstances, time could be manipulated, I am convinced about that, we only didn’t figure out yet what those conditions are (but we’re working on it), just like you said “conditions we don't know about or don't yet know exist”.</p><p>If you drop a rock from the top of a building, prediction tells us not only that it will eventually hit the ground, but also when and where, but this prediction is within a certain system because if the system is extended you may find that half on the way down the rock was pulverized by a bullet, or hit a bird, or hooked to the dress of some lady who shook it out the window to de-dust it.</p><p>I think that labeling something as a law doesn’t necessarily mean it is considered to always happen, it better would be adding “in some certain conditions”. Through time, some so-called laws (of science) are updated, not because of any exceptions but because some of those conditions were revealed, discovered.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="start at edge, post: 195420, member: 11971"] I got the idea now. Yes, what you said is absolutely true – “that something can APPEAR to always happen” but when that other chance emerges, even if very tiny, it changes “always” to “sometimes”. The examples are many: One could say that every time he turns the switch on, there is light in his room … but what if the bulb is fried or the electricity cut off – then “sometimes” the light doesn’t go on when he turns the switch. Also, one could say that there is no way the sun will not rise the next morning because that would mean the earth stopped rotating or the sun vanished, which is most unlikely to happen … what if he dies in his sleep – the sun will not rise FOR HIM anymore, bringing this out of causality aspect and putting it into relativity. It is also true what you said about certain conditions that determine completely different outcomes of some processes, depending of the nature of that condition or by it occurring or not. In most cases, even scientific processes are not doubted to happen but rather WHY they happen as they do. The physics and the math that we have at hand right now, doesn’t exclude in any way time reversal for example … and when math proves something, I for one completely trust it. In certain conditions and under certain circumstances, time could be manipulated, I am convinced about that, we only didn’t figure out yet what those conditions are (but we’re working on it), just like you said “conditions we don't know about or don't yet know exist”. If you drop a rock from the top of a building, prediction tells us not only that it will eventually hit the ground, but also when and where, but this prediction is within a certain system because if the system is extended you may find that half on the way down the rock was pulverized by a bullet, or hit a bird, or hooked to the dress of some lady who shook it out the window to de-dust it. I think that labeling something as a law doesn’t necessarily mean it is considered to always happen, it better would be adding “in some certain conditions”. Through time, some so-called laws (of science) are updated, not because of any exceptions but because some of those conditions were revealed, discovered. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Exceptions in Scientific Laws?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top