Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Fixed the internet, called it my Home.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="JDHollisterTitor" data-source="post: 87477" data-attributes="member: 5897"><p>"A dictaphone would do if you wanted to record the sound of it falling, but the more data the better."</p><p>A dictaphone would be something. Can't have something if there's no one. Can't have someone place and operate or read a dictophone if there's no one around.</p><p></p><p></p><p>"In which context are you trying to use Dualism? Because there's more than one."</p><p>Obviously the one most relevant to "balance"</p><p><img src="http://yogagoddess.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/yin-yang.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /> </p><p></p><p>"Now, if I have to spell it out for you,"</p><p>Nope, you don't, so stop being so condescending. You were blatantly ignoring something just because you didn't want to acknowledge it. Units are units are units. Measurements are relative. </p><p></p><p></p><p>"Incoherent:</p><ol> <li data-xf-list-type="ol">(of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear. "</li> </ol><p>"Nope, plenty coherent, you can not measure incoherence just by your inability to comprehend the meaning of something."</p><p></p><p></p><p>"You can link all the random articles you like"</p><p>Except it isn't random, you are just choosing to ignore the relevance. </p><p></p><p></p><p>"Well, that just about sums up that site, doesn't it?"</p><p>Nope, this sentence and your dismissive behaviour completely sums up your callow attitude and approach to a situation and discussion. I will have no further conversation with someone with selective reading who dismisses whatsoever they wish solely because they refuse to see the relevance. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>"Ctrl+F "interbeing""</p><p>"Ctrl+F "an answer""</p><p>"When we look deeply into a flower, we see the elements that have come together to allow it to manifest. We can see clouds manifesting as rain. Without the rain, nothing can grow. When I touch the flower, I’m touching the cloud and touching the rain. This is not just poetry, it’s reality. If we take the clouds and the rain out of the flower, the flower will not be there. With the eye of the Buddha, we are able to see the clouds and the rain in the flower. We can touch the sun without burning our fingers. Without the sun nothing can grow, so it’s not possible to take the sun out of the flower. The flower cannot be as a separate entity; it has to inter-be with the light, with the clouds, with the rain. The word “interbeing” is closer to reality that the word “being.” Being really means interbeing.</p><p></p><p>The same is true for me, for you, and for the Buddha. The Buddha has to inter-be with everything. Interbeing and nonself are the objects of our contemplation. We have to train ourselves so that in our daily lives we can touch the truth of interbeing and nonself in every moment. You are in touch with the clouds, with the rain, with the children, with the trees, with the rivers, with your planet, and that contact reveals the true nature of reality, the nature of impermanence, nonself, interdependence, and interbeing."</p><p></p><p></p><p>[MEDIA=youtube]nehRB1FTeTo[/MEDIA]</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="JDHollisterTitor, post: 87477, member: 5897"] "A dictaphone would do if you wanted to record the sound of it falling, but the more data the better." A dictaphone would be something. Can't have something if there's no one. Can't have someone place and operate or read a dictophone if there's no one around. "In which context are you trying to use Dualism? Because there's more than one." Obviously the one most relevant to "balance" [IMG]http://yogagoddess.ca/wp-content/uploads/2014/06/yin-yang.jpg[/IMG] "Now, if I have to spell it out for you," Nope, you don't, so stop being so condescending. You were blatantly ignoring something just because you didn't want to acknowledge it. Units are units are units. Measurements are relative. "Incoherent: [LIST=1] [*](of spoken or written language) expressed in an incomprehensible or confusing way; unclear. " [/LIST] "Nope, plenty coherent, you can not measure incoherence just by your inability to comprehend the meaning of something." "You can link all the random articles you like" Except it isn't random, you are just choosing to ignore the relevance. "Well, that just about sums up that site, doesn't it?" Nope, this sentence and your dismissive behaviour completely sums up your callow attitude and approach to a situation and discussion. I will have no further conversation with someone with selective reading who dismisses whatsoever they wish solely because they refuse to see the relevance. "Ctrl+F "interbeing"" "Ctrl+F "an answer"" "When we look deeply into a flower, we see the elements that have come together to allow it to manifest. We can see clouds manifesting as rain. Without the rain, nothing can grow. When I touch the flower, I’m touching the cloud and touching the rain. This is not just poetry, it’s reality. If we take the clouds and the rain out of the flower, the flower will not be there. With the eye of the Buddha, we are able to see the clouds and the rain in the flower. We can touch the sun without burning our fingers. Without the sun nothing can grow, so it’s not possible to take the sun out of the flower. The flower cannot be as a separate entity; it has to inter-be with the light, with the clouds, with the rain. The word “interbeing” is closer to reality that the word “being.” Being really means interbeing. The same is true for me, for you, and for the Buddha. The Buddha has to inter-be with everything. Interbeing and nonself are the objects of our contemplation. We have to train ourselves so that in our daily lives we can touch the truth of interbeing and nonself in every moment. You are in touch with the clouds, with the rain, with the children, with the trees, with the rivers, with your planet, and that contact reveals the true nature of reality, the nature of impermanence, nonself, interdependence, and interbeing." [MEDIA=youtube]nehRB1FTeTo[/MEDIA] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Fixed the internet, called it my Home.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top