Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Flat-Earth
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="nickrulercreator" data-source="post: 174968" data-attributes="member: 10256"><p>Any evidence for any of this, besides Gagarin's well-documented crash?</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Only if you stay in the most intense areas of the belts for a few weeks, especially the inner belt. Apollo missed the inner belt almost entirely, and stayed in the weaker points of the belts for no more than 4 hours each mission.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Highest... ever? I'd love to see a source for that one. While solar cycle 20 was hitting its peak in <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_20" target="_blank">November, 1968</a>, it hardly posed <a href="http://clavius.org/envsun.html" target="_blank">a threat.</a></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Nope, not true. Either the NASA rep got it wrong, or you weren't paying good enough attention. The CM consisted of, at a minimum, <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Command/Service_Module#Construction" target="_blank">.75 inches of Aluminum</a>. The <a href="https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM04_Lunar_Module_ppLV1-17.pdf" target="_blank">LM consisted of</a> a thick hull of solid aluminum wrapped in very thin layers of aluminized mylar. This was enough shielding from the radiation in space.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Radiation levels weren't ever high. If this was the case, constant communication with GPS satellites wouldn't be possible. Where are your sources for all these claims??</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="nickrulercreator, post: 174968, member: 10256"] Any evidence for any of this, besides Gagarin's well-documented crash? Only if you stay in the most intense areas of the belts for a few weeks, especially the inner belt. Apollo missed the inner belt almost entirely, and stayed in the weaker points of the belts for no more than 4 hours each mission. Highest... ever? I'd love to see a source for that one. While solar cycle 20 was hitting its peak in [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_cycle_20']November, 1968[/URL], it hardly posed [URL='http://clavius.org/envsun.html']a threat.[/URL] Nope, not true. Either the NASA rep got it wrong, or you weren't paying good enough attention. The CM consisted of, at a minimum, [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Apollo_Command/Service_Module#Construction'].75 inches of Aluminum[/URL]. The [URL='https://www.hq.nasa.gov/alsj/LM04_Lunar_Module_ppLV1-17.pdf']LM consisted of[/URL] a thick hull of solid aluminum wrapped in very thin layers of aluminized mylar. This was enough shielding from the radiation in space. Radiation levels weren't ever high. If this was the case, constant communication with GPS satellites wouldn't be possible. Where are your sources for all these claims?? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Flat-Earth
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top