Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Future Predictions
Framework of the Future
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Yeats" data-source="post: 198984" data-attributes="member: 12720"><p>I know that your questions were not directed at me but if you don't mind I would like to attempt a response to them.</p><p></p><p>Your first question was rather puzzling to me at first until I realized that it was asked in order to prolong the debate and not resolve it. If I believed that correcting your errors would cause you to rethink your position and concede your mistakes then a list of those errors would be worthwhile. Based on a review of your other posts here, I tend to doubt that there is a willingness on your part to do so, thus such a list would only produce a rebuttal instead of a re-evaluation on your part. Although I am not a Christian, I do agree with advice given in First Corinthians 14:38 as far as this question is concerned.</p><p></p><p>Your second question is very simple to answer. One can determine the accuracy of one's sources based upon how closely they conform with reality. For example, one person may believe that the recent riots were nothing more than peaceful protests while another may be aware that the riots have resulted in the deaths of at least 30 people, the injury of hundreds if not thousands of others, and property damage currently estimated in the tens of billions. The latter view conforms with reality while the former view does not, regardless of what the so-called mainstream media has reported.</p><p></p><p>I agree with the premise of your third question in that, when Mr. Trump is re-elected, those opposing him will not accept the results. This is obvious, considering the fact that those same people have not yet accepted the results of the 2016 election. I would point out that conservatives in 2008 were opposed to Mr. Obama's election, but did not dispute the results. The same would most likely hold true in the unlikely event that Mr. Biden is elected.</p><p></p><p>Your fourth question deals with Ms. Harris. I suggest that you carefully examine her record as District Attorney in San Francisco and as Attorney General of California. I assume that you would oppose jailing parents for their children's truancy or keeping inmates incarcerated in order to provide cheap labor. Ms. Harris had no such qualms about doing so, and in fact did so. These are not smears. They are historical facts that even many on the Left have acknowledged and are disgusted by.</p><p></p><p>The first part of your last question is really nothing more than a straw man argument. I doubt that a negative reaction to Mr. Trump would cause any thinking conservative to utter the phrase which you claim is "common". In fact, I recall that many of the celebrity class vowed that they would leave the country if Mr. Trump were elected back in 2016. So much for that.</p><p></p><p>In the second part of the question you ask about immigration. I believe that most conservatives favor legal immigration since it has been one of the great strengths of this nation. It is <em>illegal</em> immigration that we oppose, in the same way that you would welcome those who enter your home through the front door after being invited in and oppose those who attempt to break into your home through the back window.</p><p></p><p>I apologize for the length of this response. I normally don't ramble on like this, but I felt that your questions deserved a complete answer.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Yeats, post: 198984, member: 12720"] I know that your questions were not directed at me but if you don't mind I would like to attempt a response to them. Your first question was rather puzzling to me at first until I realized that it was asked in order to prolong the debate and not resolve it. If I believed that correcting your errors would cause you to rethink your position and concede your mistakes then a list of those errors would be worthwhile. Based on a review of your other posts here, I tend to doubt that there is a willingness on your part to do so, thus such a list would only produce a rebuttal instead of a re-evaluation on your part. Although I am not a Christian, I do agree with advice given in First Corinthians 14:38 as far as this question is concerned. Your second question is very simple to answer. One can determine the accuracy of one's sources based upon how closely they conform with reality. For example, one person may believe that the recent riots were nothing more than peaceful protests while another may be aware that the riots have resulted in the deaths of at least 30 people, the injury of hundreds if not thousands of others, and property damage currently estimated in the tens of billions. The latter view conforms with reality while the former view does not, regardless of what the so-called mainstream media has reported. I agree with the premise of your third question in that, when Mr. Trump is re-elected, those opposing him will not accept the results. This is obvious, considering the fact that those same people have not yet accepted the results of the 2016 election. I would point out that conservatives in 2008 were opposed to Mr. Obama's election, but did not dispute the results. The same would most likely hold true in the unlikely event that Mr. Biden is elected. Your fourth question deals with Ms. Harris. I suggest that you carefully examine her record as District Attorney in San Francisco and as Attorney General of California. I assume that you would oppose jailing parents for their children's truancy or keeping inmates incarcerated in order to provide cheap labor. Ms. Harris had no such qualms about doing so, and in fact did so. These are not smears. They are historical facts that even many on the Left have acknowledged and are disgusted by. The first part of your last question is really nothing more than a straw man argument. I doubt that a negative reaction to Mr. Trump would cause any thinking conservative to utter the phrase which you claim is "common". In fact, I recall that many of the celebrity class vowed that they would leave the country if Mr. Trump were elected back in 2016. So much for that. In the second part of the question you ask about immigration. I believe that most conservatives favor legal immigration since it has been one of the great strengths of this nation. It is [I]illegal[/I] immigration that we oppose, in the same way that you would welcome those who enter your home through the front door after being invited in and oppose those who attempt to break into your home through the back window. I apologize for the length of this response. I normally don't ramble on like this, but I felt that your questions deserved a complete answer. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Future Predictions
Framework of the Future
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top