Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Giant Fresnel lenses
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="EachPeachPearPlum" data-source="post: 35161" data-attributes="member: 1450"><p><strong>Re: Giant Fresnel lenses</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p> </p><p>Now thinking it over...a frensel lenses could neither be used as a solution for global warming, or as a weapon. Global warming occurs <em>within </em>the atmosphere. </p><p>A frensel lenses could not be used as a weapon because of the rip it would create in the atmosphere. If you think about the concentration of radiation entering the atmosphere at a focused point, the o-zone layer would be destroyed. Usually, in space-flight launches holes are ripped in the atmosphere, but this is only for a brief amount of time before it mends itself. In the case of shuttles you are dealing with projectiles aero-dynamically designed to enter the outer-sphere and minimalize the effects of breaking through the barrier. A weapon would be considerably larger than a shuttle (if it were to be effective and have purpose) so the recovery of the atmosphere would take a longer time, allowing other foreign substances to enter the Earth's atmosphere, and equally allowing the Earth's atmosphere to loose some of its precious balance. The effects would probably be lasting, and wouldn't only affect the targeted area.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="EachPeachPearPlum, post: 35161, member: 1450"] [b]Re: Giant Fresnel lenses[/b] Now thinking it over...a frensel lenses could neither be used as a solution for global warming, or as a weapon. Global warming occurs [I]within [/I]the atmosphere. A frensel lenses could not be used as a weapon because of the rip it would create in the atmosphere. If you think about the concentration of radiation entering the atmosphere at a focused point, the o-zone layer would be destroyed. Usually, in space-flight launches holes are ripped in the atmosphere, but this is only for a brief amount of time before it mends itself. In the case of shuttles you are dealing with projectiles aero-dynamically designed to enter the outer-sphere and minimalize the effects of breaking through the barrier. A weapon would be considerably larger than a shuttle (if it were to be effective and have purpose) so the recovery of the atmosphere would take a longer time, allowing other foreign substances to enter the Earth's atmosphere, and equally allowing the Earth's atmosphere to loose some of its precious balance. The effects would probably be lasting, and wouldn't only affect the targeted area. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
Giant Fresnel lenses
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top