Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Hello 2013 (Time Traveler from 2043)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aevi Vegr" data-source="post: 77162" data-attributes="member: 4488"><p>It's not the attempt to prove me to be a hoax that got me depressed. I am more concerned with the mystification of divergence.</p><p>It's just vector calculus. Admittedly, it's 10th dimensional vector calculus based off a dependent background. I could calculate it by hand with some great effort. Really, I wouldn't want to calculate it by hand. I learned that there is estimated to be about 10^540 worldlines that could be considered similar to my own. It's all based on the generalized theorem. There are no attractor fields, just geometry.</p><p>As for a device that has the ability to calculate divergence, it would be a large array of sensors with a very powerful computer and it could only give approximations. The method for describing the divergence might also be different. The most accurate way of describing divergence would be in relation to the central worldline. It would be very difficult to discover what is the central worldline and Humans might not even exist on it. That is absolute divergence, compared to relative divergence.</p><p>I fully believe in the possibility of 100% divergent universe. It is simply impossible to accurately call it a divergence. I am sorry for the miscommunication there, I felt that I explained it well enough. Nevertheless, I would need to expand the English Language a bit to properly describe the different types of universal polymorphism. I merely stated that it would be so far removed that it would have its own separate set of worldlines. So at 100% there is a new absolute divergence scale. I also believe that reaching such a divergence would require more than a time machine. I think it's time for me to create yet another one of my despised diagrams! I'll present it later, although it really is hard to describe multidimensional theories in 2 dimensions. The relationship between each of these divergence scales might possibly be able to be placed along another scale, which I think more appropriately could be called the universal divergence scale. Outside of that, even, might be placed the multiversal divergence scale, but I'm not sure if that term is accurate either.</p><p>Paradox, I hesitate to use your terminology. Mainly because using a planetary scale seems unwise to me. I also am not sure if describe a universe that reaches paradox as being destroyed as accurate. If there truly is a mechanism for causality, it is just as likely that in a given scenario paradoxes never happen, opposed to the scenario ending or half a dozen other possibilities.</p><p>And that brings me to an explanation as to why Paradox's trip-up is inaccurate. Knowing the mechanics is far removed from simply avoiding them. The equation shows that time travel is possible to be done in such a way as to minimize the risk of violating causality. I will quote from an earlier conversation (October 5th) with Samstwitch to explain this concept.</p><p></p><p>There is no known mechanism for causality, but that doesn't mean causality doesn't exist. It probably exists in some form, but we don't know what that forms is and we don't know how causality functions as a limiter. Nevertheless, the proposition of causality is more than enough to try to avoid it. Imagine what a paradoxical timeloop could do to a psyche? The consequences are unknown and therefore it would be foolhardy to simply blatantly disregard.</p><p></p><p>As for contradictions to my story, the most obvious one would be that I posted,</p><p>"</p><p>under my information upon joining Paranormalis and yet I have continued to state that I won't comment on the arts. I wonder what I my purpose of doing so might be?</p><p></p><p>Showing you a photo now would be like me letting you open a Christmas present early, with an emphasis on "me." And when I say that, I only refer to my relative preferential time for releasing photos. I am not adverse to giving you an early bird peak at future technologies, nor do I even consider this time to be primitive. The discomfort has more to do with my personal safety at the moment. John Titor had a mobile machine and he had trusted sources here. I have neither. Also, I am not fit or properly armed for a struggle. I am of the opinion that I am already being watched. If I post anything that could 100% positively ID me as a traveler, I would be swept up immediately. Titor also had the good fortune of arriving at a safer date. TOR is already compromised. Most encryption programs are compromised. If I introduce a new one, it would gather similar unwanted attention. Simply, expect that I probably won't release any photos until I am confident of my ability to evade other forces. As I have said before, photos of the machine itself will not be released until the day I am leaving.</p><p></p><p>What is this email experiment?</p><p></p><p>I'm sorry if I missed anyone's questions. I let posts build up and I may have missed some.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aevi Vegr, post: 77162, member: 4488"] It's not the attempt to prove me to be a hoax that got me depressed. I am more concerned with the mystification of divergence. It's just vector calculus. Admittedly, it's 10th dimensional vector calculus based off a dependent background. I could calculate it by hand with some great effort. Really, I wouldn't want to calculate it by hand. I learned that there is estimated to be about 10^540 worldlines that could be considered similar to my own. It's all based on the generalized theorem. There are no attractor fields, just geometry. As for a device that has the ability to calculate divergence, it would be a large array of sensors with a very powerful computer and it could only give approximations. The method for describing the divergence might also be different. The most accurate way of describing divergence would be in relation to the central worldline. It would be very difficult to discover what is the central worldline and Humans might not even exist on it. That is absolute divergence, compared to relative divergence. I fully believe in the possibility of 100% divergent universe. It is simply impossible to accurately call it a divergence. I am sorry for the miscommunication there, I felt that I explained it well enough. Nevertheless, I would need to expand the English Language a bit to properly describe the different types of universal polymorphism. I merely stated that it would be so far removed that it would have its own separate set of worldlines. So at 100% there is a new absolute divergence scale. I also believe that reaching such a divergence would require more than a time machine. I think it's time for me to create yet another one of my despised diagrams! I'll present it later, although it really is hard to describe multidimensional theories in 2 dimensions. The relationship between each of these divergence scales might possibly be able to be placed along another scale, which I think more appropriately could be called the universal divergence scale. Outside of that, even, might be placed the multiversal divergence scale, but I'm not sure if that term is accurate either. Paradox, I hesitate to use your terminology. Mainly because using a planetary scale seems unwise to me. I also am not sure if describe a universe that reaches paradox as being destroyed as accurate. If there truly is a mechanism for causality, it is just as likely that in a given scenario paradoxes never happen, opposed to the scenario ending or half a dozen other possibilities. And that brings me to an explanation as to why Paradox's trip-up is inaccurate. Knowing the mechanics is far removed from simply avoiding them. The equation shows that time travel is possible to be done in such a way as to minimize the risk of violating causality. I will quote from an earlier conversation (October 5th) with Samstwitch to explain this concept. There is no known mechanism for causality, but that doesn't mean causality doesn't exist. It probably exists in some form, but we don't know what that forms is and we don't know how causality functions as a limiter. Nevertheless, the proposition of causality is more than enough to try to avoid it. Imagine what a paradoxical timeloop could do to a psyche? The consequences are unknown and therefore it would be foolhardy to simply blatantly disregard. As for contradictions to my story, the most obvious one would be that I posted, " under my information upon joining Paranormalis and yet I have continued to state that I won't comment on the arts. I wonder what I my purpose of doing so might be? Showing you a photo now would be like me letting you open a Christmas present early, with an emphasis on "me." And when I say that, I only refer to my relative preferential time for releasing photos. I am not adverse to giving you an early bird peak at future technologies, nor do I even consider this time to be primitive. The discomfort has more to do with my personal safety at the moment. John Titor had a mobile machine and he had trusted sources here. I have neither. Also, I am not fit or properly armed for a struggle. I am of the opinion that I am already being watched. If I post anything that could 100% positively ID me as a traveler, I would be swept up immediately. Titor also had the good fortune of arriving at a safer date. TOR is already compromised. Most encryption programs are compromised. If I introduce a new one, it would gather similar unwanted attention. Simply, expect that I probably won't release any photos until I am confident of my ability to evade other forces. As I have said before, photos of the machine itself will not be released until the day I am leaving. What is this email experiment? I'm sorry if I missed anyone's questions. I let posts build up and I may have missed some. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Hello 2013 (Time Traveler from 2043)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top