Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Hello 2013 (Time Traveler from 2043)
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Aevi Vegr" data-source="post: 77583" data-attributes="member: 4488"><p>Yes, Apoc, I'll answer. I always try to answer people in the order that they write to me. As always, if you think I missed your question or misinterpreted it, please inform me so that I can answer it properly. In this case, I only answered Paradox404, because I grew too tired to continue writing past that, I'm sorry if you felt ignored.</p><p>Here is your answer, I believe you are getting your facts confused. The theory is that because computers will theoretically be able to create realistic simulations of the entire universe. If that is indeed the case, the number of virtual universes would outnumber the real universe, with each layer of virtual reality being a slight distortion of the previous one because of entropy. Nevertheless, if that hypothesis is true, then it is more probable that we are actually a virtual universe instead of the real universe. I'm not sure if it is possible to actually find out whether or not our universe is the <em>real</em> one. It is also true that an error correction code used in web browsing has already been found in background radiation in a binary form. While that evidence may seem to confirm the hypothesis, it still doesn't necessitate anything because maybe that is natural in the <em>real</em> universe. If you reverse your perspective you'll also see that we base our technology off of the same logical principles we see in nature and while it is an interesting happenstance, it could be that the errors are caused by either the background radiation itself and thus the error correction code might actually mimic the background radiation to compensate. This is the first I have heard about this theory, I thank you for introducing me to it. Based on what I've read about this simulation theory, string theory seems mostly uninvolved. String theory is an attempt to create the mythic unified theory of everything, but it hasn't been solved, not even in my time. The simulation theory is metaphysical, whereas String Theory is physical.</p><p>To find out whether our universe is follows that metaphysics, it would probably require a similar procedure as scientifically finding God.</p><p></p><p>Speaking of U.F.O. sightings, maybe I am doomed to be the Roswell Gray. All jokes aside though, there is a chance that I won't survive the trip, but the machine will and I was referring to that. We'll need to hope for the best scenario for this experiment to pan out. The best scenario is that I end up in both of our worldline's root worldline so that you people can receive your messages and so I can continue on to do my mission.</p><p></p><p>To the unprecedented amount of people who sent me messages over thanksgiving, I'm sorry for the delay in answering and I hope to reply to all of you soon. I will follow my protocol and answer the oldest messages first. Maybe to petition a time traveler, you could leave signposts across the nets asking for one to see if they can find, or have found, and relay such messages?</p><p></p><p>First though, I would like to announce some good news. I have finally discovered exactly what went wrong. There was a short in the connection between a forward sensor and one of the rear computer which caused a gross undercompensation, or an overcompensation depending on your perspective, that resulted in excess forces being pulled from the center of the ship. This caused the inner framework to be bent out of place and caused some unfortunately widespread damage. This included knocking out the connections for one of the rear computers, which caused the main computer to follow safety protocols and safely shut off the ship at the nearest destination. Luckily, the majority of the damage appears to be superficial. I need to at a minimum replace that inner framework before I replace or repair the damaged pieces, but I am going to attempt to see if I can redesign the framework to help ensure that it doesn't happen again. I may also try to improve the protocols again. If everything goes right, I could probably fix it by new years. I must admit that figuring this out is a great relief to me!</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Aevi Vegr, post: 77583, member: 4488"] Yes, Apoc, I'll answer. I always try to answer people in the order that they write to me. As always, if you think I missed your question or misinterpreted it, please inform me so that I can answer it properly. In this case, I only answered Paradox404, because I grew too tired to continue writing past that, I'm sorry if you felt ignored. Here is your answer, I believe you are getting your facts confused. The theory is that because computers will theoretically be able to create realistic simulations of the entire universe. If that is indeed the case, the number of virtual universes would outnumber the real universe, with each layer of virtual reality being a slight distortion of the previous one because of entropy. Nevertheless, if that hypothesis is true, then it is more probable that we are actually a virtual universe instead of the real universe. I'm not sure if it is possible to actually find out whether or not our universe is the [I]real[/I] one. It is also true that an error correction code used in web browsing has already been found in background radiation in a binary form. While that evidence may seem to confirm the hypothesis, it still doesn't necessitate anything because maybe that is natural in the [I]real[/I] universe. If you reverse your perspective you'll also see that we base our technology off of the same logical principles we see in nature and while it is an interesting happenstance, it could be that the errors are caused by either the background radiation itself and thus the error correction code might actually mimic the background radiation to compensate. This is the first I have heard about this theory, I thank you for introducing me to it. Based on what I've read about this simulation theory, string theory seems mostly uninvolved. String theory is an attempt to create the mythic unified theory of everything, but it hasn't been solved, not even in my time. The simulation theory is metaphysical, whereas String Theory is physical. To find out whether our universe is follows that metaphysics, it would probably require a similar procedure as scientifically finding God. Speaking of U.F.O. sightings, maybe I am doomed to be the Roswell Gray. All jokes aside though, there is a chance that I won't survive the trip, but the machine will and I was referring to that. We'll need to hope for the best scenario for this experiment to pan out. The best scenario is that I end up in both of our worldline's root worldline so that you people can receive your messages and so I can continue on to do my mission. To the unprecedented amount of people who sent me messages over thanksgiving, I'm sorry for the delay in answering and I hope to reply to all of you soon. I will follow my protocol and answer the oldest messages first. Maybe to petition a time traveler, you could leave signposts across the nets asking for one to see if they can find, or have found, and relay such messages? First though, I would like to announce some good news. I have finally discovered exactly what went wrong. There was a short in the connection between a forward sensor and one of the rear computer which caused a gross undercompensation, or an overcompensation depending on your perspective, that resulted in excess forces being pulled from the center of the ship. This caused the inner framework to be bent out of place and caused some unfortunately widespread damage. This included knocking out the connections for one of the rear computers, which caused the main computer to follow safety protocols and safely shut off the ship at the nearest destination. Luckily, the majority of the damage appears to be superficial. I need to at a minimum replace that inner framework before I replace or repair the damaged pieces, but I am going to attempt to see if I can redesign the framework to help ensure that it doesn't happen again. I may also try to improve the protocols again. If everything goes right, I could probably fix it by new years. I must admit that figuring this out is a great relief to me! [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travelers
Hello 2013 (Time Traveler from 2043)
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top