Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Wind7" data-source="post: 212644" data-attributes="member: 6388"><p><h3>A quick looking into the philosophies of Rene' Descartes (from Wiki so, not infallible)</h3><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(239, 239, 239)">(The following paragraph seems to help explain to the OP a slighltly differing position,</span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(239, 239, 239)"><em> however</em> mind-numbingly sedentary this may seem on my own part for posting such dribble.)</span> <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite39" alt=";)" title="Wink ;)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=";)" /></p><h3></h3><h3><em>Discourse on the Method - first paragraph of its fourth part:</em></h3><p></p><p><em>' Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; And because some men err in reasoning, and fall into Paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for Demonstrations; And finally, when I considered that the very same thoughts (presentations) which we experience when awake may also be experienced when we are asleep, while there is at that time not one of them true, I supposed that all the objects (presentations) that had ever entered into my mind when awake, had in them no more truth than the illusions of my dreams. But immediately upon this I observed that, whilst I thus wished to think that all was false, it was absolutely necessary that I, who thus thought, should be something; And as I observed that this truth, <strong>I think, therefore I am</strong>,[E] was so certain and of such evidence that no ground of doubt, however extravagant, could be alleged by the Sceptics capable of shaking it, I concluded that I might, without scruple, accept it as the <a href="https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_principle" target="_blank">first principle</a> of the philosophy of which I was in search. '</em></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Wind7, post: 212644, member: 6388"] [HEADING=2]A quick looking into the philosophies of Rene' Descartes (from Wiki so, not infallible)[/HEADING] [COLOR=rgb(239, 239, 239)](The following paragraph seems to help explain to the OP a slighltly differing position, [I] however[/I] mind-numbingly sedentary this may seem on my own part for posting such dribble.)[/COLOR] ;) [HEADING=2][/HEADING] [HEADING=2][I]Discourse on the Method - first paragraph of its fourth part:[/I][/HEADING] [I]' Accordingly, seeing that our senses sometimes deceive us, I was willing to suppose that there existed nothing really such as they presented to us; And because some men err in reasoning, and fall into Paralogisms, even on the simplest matters of Geometry, I, convinced that I was as open to error as any other, rejected as false all the reasonings I had hitherto taken for Demonstrations; And finally, when I considered that the very same thoughts (presentations) which we experience when awake may also be experienced when we are asleep, while there is at that time not one of them true, I supposed that all the objects (presentations) that had ever entered into my mind when awake, had in them no more truth than the illusions of my dreams. But immediately upon this I observed that, whilst I thus wished to think that all was false, it was absolutely necessary that I, who thus thought, should be something; And as I observed that this truth, [B]I think, therefore I am[/B],[E] was so certain and of such evidence that no ground of doubt, however extravagant, could be alleged by the Sceptics capable of shaking it, I concluded that I might, without scruple, accept it as the [URL='https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/First_principle']first principle[/URL] of the philosophy of which I was in search. '[/I] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
General Discussion Forum
General Discussion
Here is Practical Explanation about Next Life, Purpose of Human Life, philosophical/religious facts, theories etc.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top