Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
How do you explain that there is more matter than anti-matter?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Beholder" data-source="post: 247756" data-attributes="member: 14640"><p>I'm currently working on three theories for how the big bang left more matter than anti-matter. Trying to be less egocentric than established science that assumes that we are never on the opposite side of things.</p><p></p><p>* Rounding error from living in a discrete time-space fabric. I accidentally had a big bang occuring in a computer simulation, which left more matter than anti-matter because I used a discrete time-space fabric where adding and removing matter had rounding errors and time shifts. The same could happen in a reality where the time-space fabric is a discrete graph and space is just an illusion of folded connectivity.</p><p></p><p>* Creating the big bang required more energy than what existed, and we are the anti-matter and anti-energy. Makes me wonder if the +- electric pole mixup was a mistake or a greater insight of electrons being anti-electrons.</p><p></p><p>* Big bang left an opposing combination of matter and anti-energy or vice versa. Explaining why we have positive and negative charges. Electrons are a separate type of quark unrelated to up and down quarks, so the grouping might be wrong.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Beholder, post: 247756, member: 14640"] I'm currently working on three theories for how the big bang left more matter than anti-matter. Trying to be less egocentric than established science that assumes that we are never on the opposite side of things. * Rounding error from living in a discrete time-space fabric. I accidentally had a big bang occuring in a computer simulation, which left more matter than anti-matter because I used a discrete time-space fabric where adding and removing matter had rounding errors and time shifts. The same could happen in a reality where the time-space fabric is a discrete graph and space is just an illusion of folded connectivity. * Creating the big bang required more energy than what existed, and we are the anti-matter and anti-energy. Makes me wonder if the +- electric pole mixup was a mistake or a greater insight of electrons being anti-electrons. * Big bang left an opposing combination of matter and anti-energy or vice versa. Explaining why we have positive and negative charges. Electrons are a separate type of quark unrelated to up and down quarks, so the grouping might be wrong. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
How do you explain that there is more matter than anti-matter?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top