Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Apocalypse, End Times, Disasters & Survivalism
How to survive a nuclear ballistic from NK?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="titorite" data-source="post: 173494" data-attributes="member: 2769"><p>hmmmm How much do you understand about geometric thermonuclear warfare? Do you understand why everyone moved away from bigger bombs to smaller bombs and the power of overpressure? Nuclear Winter may well not be the big concern but the fact that the major governments do indeed have enough nuclear weapons to eradicate every city with a population over 2000 people is none the less concerning.</p><p></p><p>All the same, I dont see NK kicking it off. Kim is a fucking genius in his political maneuvering. Nk and SK were gonna make peace regardless of the US intent. And the bombs? of course they are being dismantled. NK doesn't need production facilities anymore. They already have the know how and more than likely they have already put munitions on sub-marines with dead-mans orders just like the UK and the US and Russia all have. Its a popular thing that all nuclear powers like to do. Put your nukes on a sub where it wont be detected. Anything ever goes wrong the subs fire last at whoever fired first. Thats why they call it mutually assured destruction. With their safety finally and fully assured they can talk freely and earnestly about peace and not the Libyan model of peace but REAL peace.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="titorite, post: 173494, member: 2769"] hmmmm How much do you understand about geometric thermonuclear warfare? Do you understand why everyone moved away from bigger bombs to smaller bombs and the power of overpressure? Nuclear Winter may well not be the big concern but the fact that the major governments do indeed have enough nuclear weapons to eradicate every city with a population over 2000 people is none the less concerning. All the same, I dont see NK kicking it off. Kim is a fucking genius in his political maneuvering. Nk and SK were gonna make peace regardless of the US intent. And the bombs? of course they are being dismantled. NK doesn't need production facilities anymore. They already have the know how and more than likely they have already put munitions on sub-marines with dead-mans orders just like the UK and the US and Russia all have. Its a popular thing that all nuclear powers like to do. Put your nukes on a sub where it wont be detected. Anything ever goes wrong the subs fire last at whoever fired first. Thats why they call it mutually assured destruction. With their safety finally and fully assured they can talk freely and earnestly about peace and not the Libyan model of peace but REAL peace. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Apocalypse, End Times, Disasters & Survivalism
How to survive a nuclear ballistic from NK?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top