Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 206233" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>The Paracas skulls are no different than other human skulls except for the purposeful deformation. Foerster deliberately lies about this. He makes his living touring naive ignoramuses through these "mysterious sites" so he's certainly not credible.</p><p></p><p>Lloyd Pye hatched a moneygrubbing scheme designed to empty the pockets of idiots by requesting more money for research - for years on end - and not spending it on research.</p><p></p><p>Graham Hancock has openly admitted that he did pretty much no research whatsoever when writing "Fingerprints of the Gods?" At least Hancock has gotten away from constantly repeating lies that were invented by other people in his genre like he used to do. Now he tells his own lies, and won't even attempt to back up what he claims. He even stated that in his most recent book.</p><p></p><p>You know, there's no reason to wonder about the past, generally speaking that is. Yeah, it's real hard to learn, much easier to sit around and pretend nobody really knows anything about it.</p><p>There's no reason to "imagine" about humans and their ancestry either. But, of course, if you prefer avoiding hard work, then that's all you got.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 206233, member: 443"] The Paracas skulls are no different than other human skulls except for the purposeful deformation. Foerster deliberately lies about this. He makes his living touring naive ignoramuses through these "mysterious sites" so he's certainly not credible. Lloyd Pye hatched a moneygrubbing scheme designed to empty the pockets of idiots by requesting more money for research - for years on end - and not spending it on research. Graham Hancock has openly admitted that he did pretty much no research whatsoever when writing "Fingerprints of the Gods?" At least Hancock has gotten away from constantly repeating lies that were invented by other people in his genre like he used to do. Now he tells his own lies, and won't even attempt to back up what he claims. He even stated that in his most recent book. You know, there's no reason to wonder about the past, generally speaking that is. Yeah, it's real hard to learn, much easier to sit around and pretend nobody really knows anything about it. There's no reason to "imagine" about humans and their ancestry either. But, of course, if you prefer avoiding hard work, then that's all you got. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top