Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Harte" data-source="post: 206368" data-attributes="member: 443"><p>Are you aware of Foerster's claims concerning the Paracas skulls? His bit about the cranial capacity being 30% larger than humans, the mysterious openings in the skulls and the lack of a sagittal suture? His DNA claims?</p><p></p><p>His 30% claim comes from him calculating the percentage using the LOW end of the range for human cranial capacity. In fact, the cranial capacities of these skulls is barely above the average for the entire human race, and well below the maximum end of the normal range.</p><p></p><p>His mysterious openings in the back of the skull - tiny easily visible holes - are the parietal formens and you'd be very hard pressed to find a human skull without them.</p><p></p><p>Many of the skulls that he has displayed online actually have a visible sagittal suture, others probably do but no photos are taken with the correct angle to even see if they do. On top of that, it's not uncommon at all for skull sutures to fuse and eventually disappear over time if the individual lived long enough. They would still be detectable, but not in a photograph or video posted online, you'd have to examine them very closely to find them.</p><p></p><p>Foerster claims to have sent samples to a geneticist - but those were contaminated. He sent more then came back with his results of unknown mDNA lineage. However, he refuses to disclose who did the analysis. In the past he (and Pye) have used a lab that "verified" bigfoot DNA in different incidences. In no case has he (or did Pye) release the actual analytical report he (they) claimed to have.</p><p></p><p>Pye was a thief, but Foerster is worse considering what he's done here is glom on to the death of Lloyd Pye and steal a dead man's cash cow.</p><p></p><p>All of the above can be verified by yourself. I've spent 20 years providing these facts to people, and thousands of other facts about the ancient past. I'm handing them to you now not caring if you believe me. I've stopped providing evidence for people who themselves provide none.</p><p></p><p>If ancient history was the meaning of life for you, then you would already know this. If you are even a slight bit curious about the ancient past, you will verify for yourself what I stated here.</p><p></p><p>Harte</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Harte, post: 206368, member: 443"] Are you aware of Foerster's claims concerning the Paracas skulls? His bit about the cranial capacity being 30% larger than humans, the mysterious openings in the skulls and the lack of a sagittal suture? His DNA claims? His 30% claim comes from him calculating the percentage using the LOW end of the range for human cranial capacity. In fact, the cranial capacities of these skulls is barely above the average for the entire human race, and well below the maximum end of the normal range. His mysterious openings in the back of the skull - tiny easily visible holes - are the parietal formens and you'd be very hard pressed to find a human skull without them. Many of the skulls that he has displayed online actually have a visible sagittal suture, others probably do but no photos are taken with the correct angle to even see if they do. On top of that, it's not uncommon at all for skull sutures to fuse and eventually disappear over time if the individual lived long enough. They would still be detectable, but not in a photograph or video posted online, you'd have to examine them very closely to find them. Foerster claims to have sent samples to a geneticist - but those were contaminated. He sent more then came back with his results of unknown mDNA lineage. However, he refuses to disclose who did the analysis. In the past he (and Pye) have used a lab that "verified" bigfoot DNA in different incidences. In no case has he (or did Pye) release the actual analytical report he (they) claimed to have. Pye was a thief, but Foerster is worse considering what he's done here is glom on to the death of Lloyd Pye and steal a dead man's cash cow. All of the above can be verified by yourself. I've spent 20 years providing these facts to people, and thousands of other facts about the ancient past. I'm handing them to you now not caring if you believe me. I've stopped providing evidence for people who themselves provide none. If ancient history was the meaning of life for you, then you would already know this. If you are even a slight bit curious about the ancient past, you will verify for yourself what I stated here. Harte [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top