Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="solderjunkie" data-source="post: 206372" data-attributes="member: 13045"><p>Forester may well be an outright con artist, the DNA evidence - and I use that term very loosely - needs to be repeated by multiple labs and sources in order to be considered credible by anyone with integrity of course. Anyone associated with Pye is someone I distrust outright since he was obviously a charlatan - starchild skull, ridiculous case. I myself have no sources for any of this I would consider legitimate verifying his claims - thats on him/them to present compelling evidence.</p><p></p><p>Thats the problem I have with all of this writ large, I have studied it, there ARE <em>REAL</em> questions outstanding and very poor mainstream explanations with gaping holes in them, however those that purport to fill those holes are represent a gaggle of con artists, delusional nutjobs and profit seeking sleaze - a shame really.</p><p></p><p>Things that make me question the mainstream narrative include the vitrification of stone, the consistent asymmetrical building style seen worldwide contemporaneous and in association with mummification, the voluminous size and weight of stones, the hardness of minerals paired with the precision of cutting and the lack of consistency in fit and finish over time, the lack of consistency in building style, sites like gobekli tepe which exist in opposition to the conventional narrative. I'm not a religious nutter who thinks the heavens parted and vengeful santa shat on the earth for lack of a sacrifice, but I do question things, especially as a person of science when I recognize the infancy and relative ignorance of science. </p><p></p><p>Parroting what I've read might be helpful, but it doesn't make it right.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="solderjunkie, post: 206372, member: 13045"] Forester may well be an outright con artist, the DNA evidence - and I use that term very loosely - needs to be repeated by multiple labs and sources in order to be considered credible by anyone with integrity of course. Anyone associated with Pye is someone I distrust outright since he was obviously a charlatan - starchild skull, ridiculous case. I myself have no sources for any of this I would consider legitimate verifying his claims - thats on him/them to present compelling evidence. Thats the problem I have with all of this writ large, I have studied it, there ARE [I]REAL[/I] questions outstanding and very poor mainstream explanations with gaping holes in them, however those that purport to fill those holes are represent a gaggle of con artists, delusional nutjobs and profit seeking sleaze - a shame really. Things that make me question the mainstream narrative include the vitrification of stone, the consistent asymmetrical building style seen worldwide contemporaneous and in association with mummification, the voluminous size and weight of stones, the hardness of minerals paired with the precision of cutting and the lack of consistency in fit and finish over time, the lack of consistency in building style, sites like gobekli tepe which exist in opposition to the conventional narrative. I'm not a religious nutter who thinks the heavens parted and vengeful santa shat on the earth for lack of a sacrifice, but I do question things, especially as a person of science when I recognize the infancy and relative ignorance of science. Parroting what I've read might be helpful, but it doesn't make it right. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Artifacts & History
Human History Hypothesis
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top