Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
I am desperately looking for a way to go back in time
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="NaturalPhilosopher" data-source="post: 171072" data-attributes="member: 9562"><p>good insights.</p><p>I like that old quote "if a scientist tells you something is possible believe them, if they say it's impossible, don't". I like to add a caveat. If they say it's impossible in a specific experimental setup yes with reasoning, believe them but if they make blanket statements without conditions then don't.</p><p></p><p>Turns out the whole concept that ideas come only from our conscious or subconscious is a sloppy conclusion at best. It's an assumption. Ever had a thought that seemed to come out of nowhere and turned out to be unusually useful at the right time? Nobody understands where that comes from.</p><p></p><p>Warren York(an inactive para member) built a time machine and claimed he discovered that anytime a photon is absorbed and emanated by an atom that it's actually absorbing and remanating time itself.</p><p></p><p>that's what you find when you build time machines, matter absorbs time like a sponge, holds it for a moment and then re-emanates it. Turns out there's two types of photons. One like light and radio and another one that's as yet of discovered by science but is responsible for quantum uncertainty(and time).</p><p></p><p>Here's an excellent excerpt that explains it nicely:</p><p></p><p><em><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)">Physicists have no understanding whatsoever of the basic element―TIME. It's still one of the great mysteries of both physics and philosophy. So if one doesn't know what TIME is, or how its passage is operationally CREATED, then the business of a time-forward timestream and a time-reversed timestream (always relative, of course, to the external OBSERVER'S timestream, which seemingly is always time-forward) can get very, very confused and messy. That's exactly where physics is at present.</span></em></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>However, there is an electromagnetic mechanism that generates the flow of time itself. I discovered the gist of it in 1971 while at Georgia Tech to get my master's degree. Have only published just a bit on it; but have recently covered it a bit more in papers I am slowly writing for The Virtual Times, Internet node <a href="http://WWW.HSV.COM" target="_blank">WWW.HSV.COM</a>. It is an engineerable mechanism, so it can eventually be TESTED, and falsified or upheld.</em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>Basically, present physics considers that photons―which are composed/made of "energy x time"―only carry ENERGY! That's like saying a moving board, made of length x width, can only carry length and not its width! Plus which, no one really knows what a PHOTON is. E.g., in 1951, four years before his death, Einstein wrote to one of his oldest friends: </em></span></p><p></p><p style="margin-left: 20px"><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em> "All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no closer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Of course, today, every rascal thinks he knows the answer, but he is mistaken."</em></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em><img src="http://www.cheniere.org/images/people/wigner1.gif" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></em></span></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>And the picture hasn't changed since he wrote that. I spent an evening once with Eugene Wigner, the physicist who put time reversal into quantum mechanics, and a scientist whom I greatly admired. For an hour or so we had a most delightful conversation, until he asked me to explain what I do and to explain scalar electromagnetics. I explained that in my view a photon transports both energy and time, and that a mass that "absorbs" a photon's ENERGY (which just turns into a wee bit of excess mass, via Einstein's equation</em></span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>m = </em></span></p> <p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em><u>E</u></em></span></p><p></p><p style="text-align: center"><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>c2</em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>must temporarily turn into MASSTIME, not mass, since it is now "coupled" to a time-tail (the ∆t portion of the photon that just "lost its energy"). </em></span></p><p></p><p><span style="color: rgb(44, 130, 201)"><em>Then when this MASSTIME emits a photon, it turns back to MASS (the time-tail of the intermediate "masstime" is torn off by the emitted photon, to couple with the photon's energy, leaving behind an entity―mass―which a priori did not and could not exist in time.) Wigner was thunderstruck. He fully agreed that the photon was composed of energy x time, but did not believe it therefore "carried a little piece of time" was well as a little piece of energy. So, he affirmed, it was only the energy that was quantized. Of course I had stated that it was the whole photon (action, or angular momentum) that was quantized, not just the energy component by itself. The energy will be DISCRETIZED, but not quantized. I did not press the issue further, because I had too much respect for Wigner to press him. But I was quite taken aback that he could believe that something made of BOTH energy and time, could only carry a finite amount of ENERGY but could not carry a finite amount of TIME! </em></span></p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/072796.htm" target="_blank">The Tom Bearden Website</a></p><p></p><p><img src="http://www.cheniere.org/images/rife/rife25.jpg" alt="" class="fr-fic fr-dii fr-draggable " style="" /></p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="NaturalPhilosopher, post: 171072, member: 9562"] good insights. I like that old quote "if a scientist tells you something is possible believe them, if they say it's impossible, don't". I like to add a caveat. If they say it's impossible in a specific experimental setup yes with reasoning, believe them but if they make blanket statements without conditions then don't. Turns out the whole concept that ideas come only from our conscious or subconscious is a sloppy conclusion at best. It's an assumption. Ever had a thought that seemed to come out of nowhere and turned out to be unusually useful at the right time? Nobody understands where that comes from. Warren York(an inactive para member) built a time machine and claimed he discovered that anytime a photon is absorbed and emanated by an atom that it's actually absorbing and remanating time itself. that's what you find when you build time machines, matter absorbs time like a sponge, holds it for a moment and then re-emanates it. Turns out there's two types of photons. One like light and radio and another one that's as yet of discovered by science but is responsible for quantum uncertainty(and time). Here's an excellent excerpt that explains it nicely: [I][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)]Physicists have no understanding whatsoever of the basic element―TIME. It's still one of the great mysteries of both physics and philosophy. So if one doesn't know what TIME is, or how its passage is operationally CREATED, then the business of a time-forward timestream and a time-reversed timestream (always relative, of course, to the external OBSERVER'S timestream, which seemingly is always time-forward) can get very, very confused and messy. That's exactly where physics is at present.[/COLOR][/I] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]However, there is an electromagnetic mechanism that generates the flow of time itself. I discovered the gist of it in 1971 while at Georgia Tech to get my master's degree. Have only published just a bit on it; but have recently covered it a bit more in papers I am slowly writing for The Virtual Times, Internet node [URL='http://WWW.HSV.COM']WWW.HSV.COM[/URL]. It is an engineerable mechanism, so it can eventually be TESTED, and falsified or upheld.[/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]Basically, present physics considers that photons―which are composed/made of "energy x time"―only carry ENERGY! That's like saying a moving board, made of length x width, can only carry length and not its width! Plus which, no one really knows what a PHOTON is. E.g., in 1951, four years before his death, Einstein wrote to one of his oldest friends: [/I][/COLOR] [INDENT][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I] "All these fifty years of conscious brooding have brought me no closer to the answer to the question, 'What are light quanta?' Of course, today, every rascal thinks he knows the answer, but he is mistaken."[/I][/COLOR][/INDENT] [CENTER][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I][IMG]http://www.cheniere.org/images/people/wigner1.gif[/IMG][/I][/COLOR][/CENTER] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]And the picture hasn't changed since he wrote that. I spent an evening once with Eugene Wigner, the physicist who put time reversal into quantum mechanics, and a scientist whom I greatly admired. For an hour or so we had a most delightful conversation, until he asked me to explain what I do and to explain scalar electromagnetics. I explained that in my view a photon transports both energy and time, and that a mass that "absorbs" a photon's ENERGY (which just turns into a wee bit of excess mass, via Einstein's equation[/I][/COLOR] [CENTER][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]m = [/I] [I][U]E[/U][/I][/COLOR][/CENTER] [CENTER][COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]c2[/I][/COLOR][/CENTER] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]must temporarily turn into MASSTIME, not mass, since it is now "coupled" to a time-tail (the ∆t portion of the photon that just "lost its energy"). [/I][/COLOR] [COLOR=rgb(44, 130, 201)][I]Then when this MASSTIME emits a photon, it turns back to MASS (the time-tail of the intermediate "masstime" is torn off by the emitted photon, to couple with the photon's energy, leaving behind an entity―mass―which a priori did not and could not exist in time.) Wigner was thunderstruck. He fully agreed that the photon was composed of energy x time, but did not believe it therefore "carried a little piece of time" was well as a little piece of energy. So, he affirmed, it was only the energy that was quantized. Of course I had stated that it was the whole photon (action, or angular momentum) that was quantized, not just the energy component by itself. The energy will be DISCRETIZED, but not quantized. I did not press the issue further, because I had too much respect for Wigner to press him. But I was quite taken aback that he could believe that something made of BOTH energy and time, could only carry a finite amount of ENERGY but could not carry a finite amount of TIME! [/I][/COLOR] [URL="http://www.cheniere.org/correspondence/072796.htm"]The Tom Bearden Website[/URL] [IMG]http://www.cheniere.org/images/rife/rife25.jpg[/IMG] [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
I am desperately looking for a way to go back in time
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top