Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
I am slowly but surely proving it wrong.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="iooqxpooi" data-source="post: 8910" data-attributes="member: 30"><p><strong>I am slowly but surely proving it wrong.</strong></p><p></p><p>The Heisenberg Unceartainty principle. With excessive calculations, I have come up with all of the figures, and now proving them correct.</p><p></p><p>Here is the thought experiment-(directly out of my notebook)(don't mind kg or g)</p><p></p><p>What if a 10 g object radiates 1 g of mass per second with a clock 3.2 meters away, moving at .2 m/s towards the object? Wouldn't the Heisenberg Unceartainty Principle be wrong?</p><p></p><p>In these calculations, I assumed c to be 3x10^8. I calculated the time dilation to be .00...1, and the shortening of mass to be .00...1(same as the time dilation). So, all I am doing now is altering the velocity a small bit to make the force of gravity equal when the radiation is let out. And thus, the Heisenber Unceartainty Principle is wrong(I know the time and the Energy)</p><p></p><p>-By the way, I have integrated the acceleration due to gravity changes-</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="iooqxpooi, post: 8910, member: 30"] [b]I am slowly but surely proving it wrong.[/b] The Heisenberg Unceartainty principle. With excessive calculations, I have come up with all of the figures, and now proving them correct. Here is the thought experiment-(directly out of my notebook)(don't mind kg or g) What if a 10 g object radiates 1 g of mass per second with a clock 3.2 meters away, moving at .2 m/s towards the object? Wouldn't the Heisenberg Unceartainty Principle be wrong? In these calculations, I assumed c to be 3x10^8. I calculated the time dilation to be .00...1, and the shortening of mass to be .00...1(same as the time dilation). So, all I am doing now is altering the velocity a small bit to make the force of gravity equal when the radiation is let out. And thus, the Heisenber Unceartainty Principle is wrong(I know the time and the Energy) -By the way, I have integrated the acceleration due to gravity changes- [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Science & Technology
I am slowly but surely proving it wrong.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top