Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
i finally figure it out, it was right there all along
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="samzeman" data-source="post: 187692" data-attributes="member: 11182"><p>I know, it's semantic, you're equally right to say positron or anti-electron. I'm just spreading knowledge rly.</p><p></p><p>Philosophy in time travel is a bit different to regular philosophy though I think. I mean it more in a colloquial sense - it's your perception of what time travel is, and your impression of how it works. I realise in retrospect it was a strange use of the word and I would've done better just saying "some people think that time is like X" without confusing the issue with philosophy. </p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Things might be able to cause themselves to move, there are stationary forms of energy that can be converted into kinetic energy. I don't really understand your second sentence, but a single moment I'd say is the smallest possible unit of time we can measure - The time it takes light to travel the shortest distance we can measure, a planck length. It's known as Planck's time I think. Or, in casual conversation, I'd say a moment is like... the time it takes to have a thought. Which varies greatly. But that's why two people can share a moment for a lot longer than a second, or someone can have an incredible idea and then forget it in a moment.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="samzeman, post: 187692, member: 11182"] I know, it's semantic, you're equally right to say positron or anti-electron. I'm just spreading knowledge rly. Philosophy in time travel is a bit different to regular philosophy though I think. I mean it more in a colloquial sense - it's your perception of what time travel is, and your impression of how it works. I realise in retrospect it was a strange use of the word and I would've done better just saying "some people think that time is like X" without confusing the issue with philosophy. Things might be able to cause themselves to move, there are stationary forms of energy that can be converted into kinetic energy. I don't really understand your second sentence, but a single moment I'd say is the smallest possible unit of time we can measure - The time it takes light to travel the shortest distance we can measure, a planck length. It's known as Planck's time I think. Or, in casual conversation, I'd say a moment is like... the time it takes to have a thought. Which varies greatly. But that's why two people can share a moment for a lot longer than a second, or someone can have an incredible idea and then forget it in a moment. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
i finally figure it out, it was right there all along
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top