Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
I have interviewed time travelers. Ask me anything.
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="mthamson" data-source="post: 170756" data-attributes="member: 10291"><p>Einstein and TimeFlipper. I do not wish to cause controversy. My intentions are selfish in nature, as I wish to understand the perceptions of travel and to find others. I am more than open to answer any questions of specificity. I do not purport to be an expert in all matters, but fundamental understanding of methods and physics are required for my position. Therefore, I can answer questions related to either or to my position and requirements.</p><p></p><p>To answer the apprehensive statement: this universe contains the operations required for travel. Some do not, or do not have comparability. In research I see here, there is some touching to the phenomena required in loop quantum gravity and some characteristics of string theory. There is still much to be developed, and many incorrect assumptions exist. I can expound to most levels depending on what degree of understanding you have curiosities to. </p><p></p><p>As a cursory statement: fundamental forces operate in equivalent magnitudes. However, they are expressed within base interacting loops at different magnitudes. As example: magnetism and gravity are equivalent in their elementary states. However, as perceived, magnetism expresses higher interactive force compared to gravity. This disassociation is due to the accumulation of some probabilities of gravity in higher order spin loops. In deciphering the probabilities of these spin loops, one can, for example, cause low probability for gravity to function in higher states in a local area. The effect is an increase in magnitude of gravity in the unwinding into operational states. As a practical application, one can create gravitational traction which can be used to push or pull.</p><p></p><p>Higher states provide the basis for travel. Each probability of a system creates all outcomes simultaneously. For example, if a particle increases energy to a place of 2 potential spin states, both become existent. The accumulation of existent states at this moment forms a new probability brane. Consider a brane as a new universe which exists in parallel, separated by higher order loop states. All that is needed for travel is to understand backwards probabilities within a finite inertial frame. Consider this as reverse engineering. One knows the outcome and the properties of the particles, and can therefore consider the most probable starting point(s). By obtaining the proportional probabilities lost of a selection of particles from start to current point, the assignment of the higher order loop states can be determined. One can then force particles into these probabilities and across brane boundaries. That is how I traveled here.</p><p></p><p>In speaking of false others or known hoaxers, the experience, purpose and information of travel is rather dull. My origin brane, although in a potential future of your past, does not offer nefarious consequences to yours. In fact, no consequences are relevant as probabilities are independent. No exacting statements can be made on the future of this brane, only probabilities.</p><p></p><p>My purpose is the comparison of engineering and probabilistic progression. Divergence of branes is like two separated twins. Sharing of similarities makes the study of differences important to the statistics of capabilities. The computer I am writing on currently is the accumulation of progressive technologies within one progression set. It is different than the development in my brane but only slightly in a large perspective and from comparative advancement points. Time has progressed further in my brane, technology is more developed in my brane. This computer offers insight into the divergence of methods and can offer suggestions for the furthering of our technology. In addition, the comparison of origin states and progression offers methods for prediction of likely future states. This assists the same travel technology to interpret forward movement, albiet of less pronounced magnitude. Forward movement is most relevant as it can permit technological development from "future" advances.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="mthamson, post: 170756, member: 10291"] Einstein and TimeFlipper. I do not wish to cause controversy. My intentions are selfish in nature, as I wish to understand the perceptions of travel and to find others. I am more than open to answer any questions of specificity. I do not purport to be an expert in all matters, but fundamental understanding of methods and physics are required for my position. Therefore, I can answer questions related to either or to my position and requirements. To answer the apprehensive statement: this universe contains the operations required for travel. Some do not, or do not have comparability. In research I see here, there is some touching to the phenomena required in loop quantum gravity and some characteristics of string theory. There is still much to be developed, and many incorrect assumptions exist. I can expound to most levels depending on what degree of understanding you have curiosities to. As a cursory statement: fundamental forces operate in equivalent magnitudes. However, they are expressed within base interacting loops at different magnitudes. As example: magnetism and gravity are equivalent in their elementary states. However, as perceived, magnetism expresses higher interactive force compared to gravity. This disassociation is due to the accumulation of some probabilities of gravity in higher order spin loops. In deciphering the probabilities of these spin loops, one can, for example, cause low probability for gravity to function in higher states in a local area. The effect is an increase in magnitude of gravity in the unwinding into operational states. As a practical application, one can create gravitational traction which can be used to push or pull. Higher states provide the basis for travel. Each probability of a system creates all outcomes simultaneously. For example, if a particle increases energy to a place of 2 potential spin states, both become existent. The accumulation of existent states at this moment forms a new probability brane. Consider a brane as a new universe which exists in parallel, separated by higher order loop states. All that is needed for travel is to understand backwards probabilities within a finite inertial frame. Consider this as reverse engineering. One knows the outcome and the properties of the particles, and can therefore consider the most probable starting point(s). By obtaining the proportional probabilities lost of a selection of particles from start to current point, the assignment of the higher order loop states can be determined. One can then force particles into these probabilities and across brane boundaries. That is how I traveled here. In speaking of false others or known hoaxers, the experience, purpose and information of travel is rather dull. My origin brane, although in a potential future of your past, does not offer nefarious consequences to yours. In fact, no consequences are relevant as probabilities are independent. No exacting statements can be made on the future of this brane, only probabilities. My purpose is the comparison of engineering and probabilistic progression. Divergence of branes is like two separated twins. Sharing of similarities makes the study of differences important to the statistics of capabilities. The computer I am writing on currently is the accumulation of progressive technologies within one progression set. It is different than the development in my brane but only slightly in a large perspective and from comparative advancement points. Time has progressed further in my brane, technology is more developed in my brane. This computer offers insight into the divergence of methods and can offer suggestions for the furthering of our technology. In addition, the comparison of origin states and progression offers methods for prediction of likely future states. This assists the same travel technology to interpret forward movement, albiet of less pronounced magnitude. Forward movement is most relevant as it can permit technological development from "future" advances. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
I have interviewed time travelers. Ask me anything.
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top