Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
I think I have decrypted JT's TM, and explained it
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Fringan" data-source="post: 12802" data-attributes="member: 110"><p><strong>I think I have decrypted JT's TM, and explained it</strong></p><p></p><p>I'm not after disapointing anyone, but isn't a naked singularity supposed to be a infinitly small point with infinite density? I'm not sure one of those could even have a shape (of a kiwi, a sphere, a bunny or whatever <img src="" class="smilie smilie--sprite smilie--sprite38" alt=":)" title="Smile :)" loading="lazy" data-shortname=":)" />).</p><p></p><p>Creating a naked singularity surely could be done with a charge but it would take something like all the electrons in our entire solar system to create such a charge.</p><p>"This is, of course, totally impractical", as wikipedia says.</p><p></p><p>What else? What gravitational property would a sigularity have? infinte denisty, what does that tell us? propbably something like infinite mass, thus huge gravitational force. The earth, Mars and the sun and alot of other stuff would probably be sucked in and create an event horizon and the singularity would no longer be naked.</p><p>UNLESS singularities follow the laws of quantum mechanics instead of spacetime&EM. That would probably create more problems though.</p><p>I'm just trying to say we don't even know if naked singularities can excist and even if they thoretically can; could we create one, keep it stable and under control?</p><p></p><p>I'm not an expert in this subject but I don't see how you could overlap event horizons from two naked singularities since the defenition of a naked singularity is a singularity who LACKS an event horizon?</p><p></p><p></p><p>However, it's an entertaining idea, Titors time machine, and alot of fun thinking about. Perhaps science will be proved wrong on this one, as has happened many times before.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Fringan, post: 12802, member: 110"] [b]I think I have decrypted JT's TM, and explained it[/b] I'm not after disapointing anyone, but isn't a naked singularity supposed to be a infinitly small point with infinite density? I'm not sure one of those could even have a shape (of a kiwi, a sphere, a bunny or whatever :)). Creating a naked singularity surely could be done with a charge but it would take something like all the electrons in our entire solar system to create such a charge. "This is, of course, totally impractical", as wikipedia says. What else? What gravitational property would a sigularity have? infinte denisty, what does that tell us? propbably something like infinite mass, thus huge gravitational force. The earth, Mars and the sun and alot of other stuff would probably be sucked in and create an event horizon and the singularity would no longer be naked. UNLESS singularities follow the laws of quantum mechanics instead of spacetime&EM. That would probably create more problems though. I'm just trying to say we don't even know if naked singularities can excist and even if they thoretically can; could we create one, keep it stable and under control? I'm not an expert in this subject but I don't see how you could overlap event horizons from two naked singularities since the defenition of a naked singularity is a singularity who LACKS an event horizon? However, it's an entertaining idea, Titors time machine, and alot of fun thinking about. Perhaps science will be proved wrong on this one, as has happened many times before. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
I think I have decrypted JT's TM, and explained it
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top