Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Inauguration of George W. Bush
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="CaryP" data-source="post: 15136" data-attributes="member: 34"><p><strong>Inauguration of George W. Bush</strong></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, I can sore loser. Can you say fraudulent winner? I'm not a Kerry supporter, but I damn sure aren't a Bush supporter. Your statistical analysis is flawed. Just because 40% of the country's registered voters didn't vote, doesn't mean they're "OK" with the Bushco gang. There were numerous reports of inadequate voting machines in predominantly Democratic precints, causing voting time to be anywhere from 2 to 7 hours. A majority of these precincts are lower income demographically. These workers did not have the time it took to stand around all day and vote. They needed to be at work. That's just the tip of the iceberg. There are tons of evidence that the election was rigged ahead of time, so maybe it wouldn't have mattered if these people would have taken the 7 hrs. to vote. Polls before the election showed a very close race. We're not a 30-30-40 country. 70% of the American populace is not "OK" with the Bushco gang.</p><p></p><p>To show you how serious the Bushco gang is about having the inauguration go have without any "dissidents" in W's face, the event has been deemed a National Special Security Event. This means they can pretty well do whatever they damn please to keep "dissidents" out of view. While the protestors may be able to pull something off, they'll probably be arrested and God knows what out of camera site. </p><p></p><p>Here's a link to the DHS announcement about the inauguration.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=4101" target="_blank">U.S. Department of Homeland Security Designates 2005 Presidential Inauguration as National Special Security Event </a></p><p></p><p>The New York Times has an article out today about the security measures to be taken at unprecedented levels.</p><p></p><p><a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/13/politics/13security.html?oref=login&th" target="_blank">First Inauguration Since 9/11 Spurs Tightest Security</a></p><p></p><p>You may need to do a free registration to be able to see the article.</p><p></p><p>Here's some excerpts from the article.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, we're so "OK" with W he needs troops, snipers, and military to keep protestors away. He's "OK" with mainstream America too. I'm sure he knows how much they're "OK" with him.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>W just doesn't want to see anyone not liking him. It's been the M.O. of his admin over the last four years. You want to protest, go to the "free speach zone" or cops will be all over your ass and you'll be arrested and prosecuted.</p><p></p><p></p><p></p><p>Yeah, that's just what we need, a military base for a national captial. Uni, may I recommend you wake up and smell the coffee, or just get your head out of a very dark place. This ain't no "sore loser" or "70% are OK with Bush" thing. This is more serious than most of the sleep walking sheeple out there can begin to understand. And as far as W's "one day in the sun", you got to be kiddin' me. He's had four years "in the sun" and it looks like the elections were rigged for another four years "in the sun." That's the kind of "sun" that you can get some serious burn from.</p><p></p><p>Cary</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="CaryP, post: 15136, member: 34"] [b]Inauguration of George W. Bush[/b] Yeah, I can sore loser. Can you say fraudulent winner? I'm not a Kerry supporter, but I damn sure aren't a Bush supporter. Your statistical analysis is flawed. Just because 40% of the country's registered voters didn't vote, doesn't mean they're "OK" with the Bushco gang. There were numerous reports of inadequate voting machines in predominantly Democratic precints, causing voting time to be anywhere from 2 to 7 hours. A majority of these precincts are lower income demographically. These workers did not have the time it took to stand around all day and vote. They needed to be at work. That's just the tip of the iceberg. There are tons of evidence that the election was rigged ahead of time, so maybe it wouldn't have mattered if these people would have taken the 7 hrs. to vote. Polls before the election showed a very close race. We're not a 30-30-40 country. 70% of the American populace is not "OK" with the Bushco gang. To show you how serious the Bushco gang is about having the inauguration go have without any "dissidents" in W's face, the event has been deemed a National Special Security Event. This means they can pretty well do whatever they damn please to keep "dissidents" out of view. While the protestors may be able to pull something off, they'll probably be arrested and God knows what out of camera site. Here's a link to the DHS announcement about the inauguration. [url=http://www.dhs.gov/dhspublic/display?content=4101]U.S. Department of Homeland Security Designates 2005 Presidential Inauguration as National Special Security Event [/url] The New York Times has an article out today about the security measures to be taken at unprecedented levels. [url=http://www.nytimes.com/2004/12/13/politics/13security.html?oref=login&th]First Inauguration Since 9/11 Spurs Tightest Security[/url] You may need to do a free registration to be able to see the article. Here's some excerpts from the article. Yeah, we're so "OK" with W he needs troops, snipers, and military to keep protestors away. He's "OK" with mainstream America too. I'm sure he knows how much they're "OK" with him. W just doesn't want to see anyone not liking him. It's been the M.O. of his admin over the last four years. You want to protest, go to the "free speach zone" or cops will be all over your ass and you'll be arrested and prosecuted. Yeah, that's just what we need, a military base for a national captial. Uni, may I recommend you wake up and smell the coffee, or just get your head out of a very dark place. This ain't no "sore loser" or "70% are OK with Bush" thing. This is more serious than most of the sleep walking sheeple out there can begin to understand. And as far as W's "one day in the sun", you got to be kiddin' me. He's had four years "in the sun" and it looks like the elections were rigged for another four years "in the sun." That's the kind of "sun" that you can get some serious burn from. Cary [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Inauguration of George W. Bush
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top