Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Sanyam Deshi" data-source="post: 96095" data-attributes="member: 5926"><p>I don't think Ren would be trying to put such a blindfold over everyone if he wasn't confident that there was a parallel between the two works. If I actually cared to look into it, I'd probably find the same parallels myself. Heck, I'd probably come to the same conclusions Ren came to... but what's the point of coming to a conclusion about a historical work if you are unsure of the validity to that work? The whole point of my argument, which I have been trying to get across to you two for weeks now, is that despite the fact that these parallels exist, there may be little integrity or validity to the work that Ren is referring to.</p><p></p><p>Ren's entire "factual claim" is based on the assumption that the documentation of Azizus is a 100% factual piece of source material that undoubtedly relays the events in a direct and valid manner. That's an extremely biased stance to take. Wouldn't you say that it takes away from the entire idea of an intelligible debate?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Sanyam Deshi, post: 96095, member: 5926"] I don't think Ren would be trying to put such a blindfold over everyone if he wasn't confident that there was a parallel between the two works. If I actually cared to look into it, I'd probably find the same parallels myself. Heck, I'd probably come to the same conclusions Ren came to... but what's the point of coming to a conclusion about a historical work if you are unsure of the validity to that work? The whole point of my argument, which I have been trying to get across to you two for weeks now, is that despite the fact that these parallels exist, there may be little integrity or validity to the work that Ren is referring to. Ren's entire "factual claim" is based on the assumption that the documentation of Azizus is a 100% factual piece of source material that undoubtedly relays the events in a direct and valid manner. That's an extremely biased stance to take. Wouldn't you say that it takes away from the entire idea of an intelligible debate? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Spirituality & Mysticism
Is Jesus Azizus Monobaz?
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top