Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Is there any current confirmed TIME TRAVELERS ON HERE NOW???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Element115" data-source="post: 180033" data-attributes="member: 10457"><p>[USER=10263]@Kairos[/USER], It's only fallacy if you say Sasquatch does <strong>NOT</strong> exist <strong>BECAUSE</strong> you can't prove it. No one said it doesn't exist. But to say it exists requires <u>proof</u>. To say it does not exist, also requires <u>proof</u>. How do you say something is or is not without direct observance or interaction? The fact of the matter is no one knows one way or the other until evidence is produced to back the claim. Until then, it's considered myth or urban legend. Our only fact is that some people may or may not have seen what they believe to be part man part gorilla or ape, walking through mountains and forests. To prove Sasquatch does not exist is less likely than to prove it does exist. Proving it exists would be easier than the contrary but at this moment in time we would consider both to be equally implausible. If you had Sasquatch hair and you could test the DNA and confirm it's not a known species then you'd have your first step of proof towards existence. If you had supposed Sasquatch hair and you tested the DNA and it appears to be a known species, you have more evidence towards Sasquatch not existing. History dictates we will consider it to not exist or be urban legend/myth until it is proven as fact - as this was the case with other species throughout history during their first discoveries.</p><p></p><p>How do we determine things like magic are not real? Because all things in the past that have been attributed to magic that we now understand have been identified as technology. Therefore we can draw the conclusion that magic is what individuals call technology which they cannot comprehend. To prove something doesn't exist is to link all evidence of it existing and having it attributed to something you know to be real.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Element115, post: 180033, member: 10457"] [USER=10263]@Kairos[/USER], It's only fallacy if you say Sasquatch does [B]NOT[/B] exist [B]BECAUSE[/B] you can't prove it. No one said it doesn't exist. But to say it exists requires [U]proof[/U]. To say it does not exist, also requires [U]proof[/U]. How do you say something is or is not without direct observance or interaction? The fact of the matter is no one knows one way or the other until evidence is produced to back the claim. Until then, it's considered myth or urban legend. Our only fact is that some people may or may not have seen what they believe to be part man part gorilla or ape, walking through mountains and forests. To prove Sasquatch does not exist is less likely than to prove it does exist. Proving it exists would be easier than the contrary but at this moment in time we would consider both to be equally implausible. If you had Sasquatch hair and you could test the DNA and confirm it's not a known species then you'd have your first step of proof towards existence. If you had supposed Sasquatch hair and you tested the DNA and it appears to be a known species, you have more evidence towards Sasquatch not existing. History dictates we will consider it to not exist or be urban legend/myth until it is proven as fact - as this was the case with other species throughout history during their first discoveries. How do we determine things like magic are not real? Because all things in the past that have been attributed to magic that we now understand have been identified as technology. Therefore we can draw the conclusion that magic is what individuals call technology which they cannot comprehend. To prove something doesn't exist is to link all evidence of it existing and having it attributed to something you know to be real. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Is there any current confirmed TIME TRAVELERS ON HERE NOW???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top