Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Is there any current confirmed TIME TRAVELERS ON HERE NOW???
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="MindUnderMatter" data-source="post: 180143" data-attributes="member: 11068"><p>How much construction effort is easier than building a time machine and sending a person back in time to retrieve technology that is outdated even in the time period the time traveler arrives in? There is little to nothing made 100 years ago that we don't know how to reproduce. It's simply a question of cost vs. return. In the case of Titor's explanation, duplicating 1960's tech would be exponentially cheaper, easier, and faster than sending a guy back in time to retrieve it. They can build a time travel device but they can't duplicate a silly, primitive 1960's computer?</p><p></p><p>Beyond even that, software on future computers could EASILY be written to duplicate ANY functionality of the computer in question - including a full-scale emulator that would load and run any executables that would run on the computer being sought.</p><p></p><p>NONE of that story makes ANY sense.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="MindUnderMatter, post: 180143, member: 11068"] How much construction effort is easier than building a time machine and sending a person back in time to retrieve technology that is outdated even in the time period the time traveler arrives in? There is little to nothing made 100 years ago that we don't know how to reproduce. It's simply a question of cost vs. return. In the case of Titor's explanation, duplicating 1960's tech would be exponentially cheaper, easier, and faster than sending a guy back in time to retrieve it. They can build a time travel device but they can't duplicate a silly, primitive 1960's computer? Beyond even that, software on future computers could EASILY be written to duplicate ANY functionality of the computer in question - including a full-scale emulator that would load and run any executables that would run on the computer being sought. NONE of that story makes ANY sense. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Is there any current confirmed TIME TRAVELERS ON HERE NOW???
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top