Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="sinister" data-source="post: 19434" data-attributes="member: 208"><p><strong>Re: John Titor</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"August\")</div></p><p></p><p>I completely agree. The original "John Titor" thread in this proven hoaxes forum was made by Razimus as I recall, and contained his conversation with a reknowned physicist, as well as what he believed was damning information concerning CERN's schedule on Collider. I thought this was pretty important evidence against Titor, although I would think modern physicists would have no credibility in this regard as physics is a science that constantly changes, despite what the leading experts at the time say, and as we see in the other thread, CERN has changed its mind to fit almost flawlessly with Titor's story. So, in my mind, Razimus' 'debunking' of Titor no longer holds weight, and I feel that the 'Spearweasel' issue has little to no weight either. This thread should be moved, deleted, or restarted if someone has any credible evidence to end the Titor debate. I like the idea of this forum being where hoaxes go to die, and I think it would be smart to keep it that way. Don't wanna step on anyone's toes since I'm new here, just wanted to back up what August said.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="sinister, post: 19434, member: 208"] [b]Re: John Titor[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"August\")</div> I completely agree. The original "John Titor" thread in this proven hoaxes forum was made by Razimus as I recall, and contained his conversation with a reknowned physicist, as well as what he believed was damning information concerning CERN's schedule on Collider. I thought this was pretty important evidence against Titor, although I would think modern physicists would have no credibility in this regard as physics is a science that constantly changes, despite what the leading experts at the time say, and as we see in the other thread, CERN has changed its mind to fit almost flawlessly with Titor's story. So, in my mind, Razimus' 'debunking' of Titor no longer holds weight, and I feel that the 'Spearweasel' issue has little to no weight either. This thread should be moved, deleted, or restarted if someone has any credible evidence to end the Titor debate. I like the idea of this forum being where hoaxes go to die, and I think it would be smart to keep it that way. Don't wanna step on anyone's toes since I'm new here, just wanted to back up what August said. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
John Titor
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top