Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
JT Foundation/Oliver Williams Research
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="HuntTech" data-source="post: 10135" data-attributes="member: 147"><p><strong>JT Foundation/Oliver Williams Research</strong></p><p></p><p>All:</p><p></p><p> I think I tried to stay on-topic, but it was necessary to explain my perspective regarding the research that was opened up on this thread. I think my post was topical because it had to do with what I feel *could be* a veiled attempt to suppress or stop the attempt at finding an answer. I feel that to be en pointe with the thread's purpose and topic. It was necessary to characterize anomalies.net for that reason as well.</p><p></p><p> I didn't really say anything bad about Darby. As a matter of fact, I think Darby to be very birght and he certainly researches the science of JT's machine to the n-th degree... sometimes being painfully thorough.</p><p></p><p> All-in-all, I find Darby to be fairly nice in direct email exchanges, and I find him to be very intelligent with his answers in postings. I just find it sad that when newcomers enter an idea (seemingly anywhere... on any forum), they are met with resistance. I don't want to see this research left only to the 'chosen few' that feel they have a right to be the only ones. There is a very good reason that I have not posted anywhere through this whole saga - I never felt welcome nor have I felt that *I* wouldn't be bashed immediately. This isn't specific to anomalies... it seemed to be evident on most TT forums... this one excluded. I found the atmosphere most friendly here.</p><p></p><p> It is a poor tactic to quash newcomers and their ideas. It limits your discoveries.</p><p></p><p> Again, I wasn't bashing anomalies... I was merely explaining my stance and that had the purpose of expressing direct feelings about the research information in this thread.</p><p></p><p> Since Darby's post, where have we gone with the research.. and for that matter, how far have we diverged from the topic? I think the tactic already worked. So we met with a supposed dead-end with the Oliver Williams link... or did we? We lost the influx of information from virtualgirl who seemed more adept at chasing down leads... and we stopped looking into other 'Oliver Williams' people.</p><p></p><p> This is on-topic, IMHO, because it directly relates to the research and how it stopped.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="HuntTech, post: 10135, member: 147"] [b]JT Foundation/Oliver Williams Research[/b] All: I think I tried to stay on-topic, but it was necessary to explain my perspective regarding the research that was opened up on this thread. I think my post was topical because it had to do with what I feel *could be* a veiled attempt to suppress or stop the attempt at finding an answer. I feel that to be en pointe with the thread's purpose and topic. It was necessary to characterize anomalies.net for that reason as well. I didn't really say anything bad about Darby. As a matter of fact, I think Darby to be very birght and he certainly researches the science of JT's machine to the n-th degree... sometimes being painfully thorough. All-in-all, I find Darby to be fairly nice in direct email exchanges, and I find him to be very intelligent with his answers in postings. I just find it sad that when newcomers enter an idea (seemingly anywhere... on any forum), they are met with resistance. I don't want to see this research left only to the 'chosen few' that feel they have a right to be the only ones. There is a very good reason that I have not posted anywhere through this whole saga - I never felt welcome nor have I felt that *I* wouldn't be bashed immediately. This isn't specific to anomalies... it seemed to be evident on most TT forums... this one excluded. I found the atmosphere most friendly here. It is a poor tactic to quash newcomers and their ideas. It limits your discoveries. Again, I wasn't bashing anomalies... I was merely explaining my stance and that had the purpose of expressing direct feelings about the research information in this thread. Since Darby's post, where have we gone with the research.. and for that matter, how far have we diverged from the topic? I think the tactic already worked. So we met with a supposed dead-end with the Oliver Williams link... or did we? We lost the influx of information from virtualgirl who seemed more adept at chasing down leads... and we stopped looking into other 'Oliver Williams' people. This is on-topic, IMHO, because it directly relates to the research and how it stopped. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
JT Foundation/Oliver Williams Research
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top