Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kay Titor 177 Tempus Edax Rerum
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="dh1" data-source="post: 149529" data-attributes="member: 2831"><p>Paula I talked to Einstein in private conversations for a year everyday.</p><p></p><p>My advice to all of ya is to believe everything you read but only act on very little. Only reason why is people cannot retain a balanced perspective one way or another. Skeptics always become imbalanced skeptics but pretend not to be. It's a safe position socially to be a skeptic. Not a safe position socially to believe everything.</p><p></p><p>People cannot remain balanced, so why not try the opposite and believe everything without proof. When ya believe everything ya take it serious enough to study which takes years. Then ya really find working stuff that has enough info to replicate it.</p><p></p><p>People dismiss really elaborate and thorough technical information cuz it doesn't have photos or a video....it's ridiculous. The VRIL compendium is a whole encyclopedia of experiments and results. Thousands of pages and that's less than 1% of the technical info out there.</p><p></p><p>Almost like this field requires suspension of all judgement for 20yrs...no human can do that so why not just believe it? Later with enough work ya get the proof. Seems to be the key to success.</p><p></p><p>It's almost like it's designed this way as some sort of spiritual initiation. The grand temptation seems to be that of falling to irrational skepticism. It's a highly comfortable position.</p><p></p><p>Four mistakes fake 'skeptics' make:</p><p>1)they don't listen to all sources of info for emotional reasons that they possibly might being scammed.</p><p></p><p>2) they don't make the proper judgement of 'inconclusive' due to a lack of proof for or against it. They always skew their conclusion towards being a scam due to lack of proof but not information that can lead to proof if they tried to replicate.</p><p></p><p>3)they don't try to falsify results they already get.</p><p></p><p>4)claim that statistical proof is the same as hard proof, it's not.</p><p></p><p>This is why most people never really learn actual results..if they do it's either by random trial and error or if they meet an insider that shares proof. One example is ufo researchers, they have some proof but nothing spectacular. None of them try to replicate building a ufo. They're always with their hand out to the gov 'please pweeze, give us proof dear gov'..etc.</p><p></p><p>You're either a no-knownothing irrational skeptic or a 'mother may I' type begging the gov or other inventors. This is why most people are outsiders.</p><p></p><p>Once ya start believing everything, you find all the proof staring ya in the face. Steven Greer is correct, we've already had full ufo tech disclosure.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="dh1, post: 149529, member: 2831"] Paula I talked to Einstein in private conversations for a year everyday. My advice to all of ya is to believe everything you read but only act on very little. Only reason why is people cannot retain a balanced perspective one way or another. Skeptics always become imbalanced skeptics but pretend not to be. It's a safe position socially to be a skeptic. Not a safe position socially to believe everything. People cannot remain balanced, so why not try the opposite and believe everything without proof. When ya believe everything ya take it serious enough to study which takes years. Then ya really find working stuff that has enough info to replicate it. People dismiss really elaborate and thorough technical information cuz it doesn't have photos or a video....it's ridiculous. The VRIL compendium is a whole encyclopedia of experiments and results. Thousands of pages and that's less than 1% of the technical info out there. Almost like this field requires suspension of all judgement for 20yrs...no human can do that so why not just believe it? Later with enough work ya get the proof. Seems to be the key to success. It's almost like it's designed this way as some sort of spiritual initiation. The grand temptation seems to be that of falling to irrational skepticism. It's a highly comfortable position. Four mistakes fake 'skeptics' make: 1)they don't listen to all sources of info for emotional reasons that they possibly might being scammed. 2) they don't make the proper judgement of 'inconclusive' due to a lack of proof for or against it. They always skew their conclusion towards being a scam due to lack of proof but not information that can lead to proof if they tried to replicate. 3)they don't try to falsify results they already get. 4)claim that statistical proof is the same as hard proof, it's not. This is why most people never really learn actual results..if they do it's either by random trial and error or if they meet an insider that shares proof. One example is ufo researchers, they have some proof but nothing spectacular. None of them try to replicate building a ufo. They're always with their hand out to the gov 'please pweeze, give us proof dear gov'..etc. You're either a no-knownothing irrational skeptic or a 'mother may I' type begging the gov or other inventors. This is why most people are outsiders. Once ya start believing everything, you find all the proof staring ya in the face. Steven Greer is correct, we've already had full ufo tech disclosure. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
John Titor's Legacy
Kay Titor 177 Tempus Edax Rerum
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top