Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
"Lib'rul" media refuses to call christian terrorist the "T" word
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Darkwolf" data-source="post: 25272" data-attributes="member: 177"><p><strong>Re: &quot;Lib'rul&quot; media refuses to call christian terrorist, the &quot;T&quot; word</strong></p><p></p><p> Where did I claim that Rudolph was the first of his kind? And the answer to why he did not get charged with terrorism I believe is that he plea bargened to avoid those charges and the death penelty. The media these days are very lothe to call somone a terrorist (or anything else) unless they have been convicted. Notice that even in a very clear cut case, the media will always use words like alleged when refering to a criminal. Why is this you ask? To avoid being sued. BTW I saw an article in the washington post where he was called a terrorist, so some of the media is doing it anyway. </p><p> </p><p> </p><p> </p><p>Well, they were terrorists. So was Rudolph. The guy isn't going to see the light of day again. What more do you want?</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Darkwolf, post: 25272, member: 177"] [b]Re: "Lib'rul" media refuses to call christian terrorist, the "T" word[/b] Where did I claim that Rudolph was the first of his kind? And the answer to why he did not get charged with terrorism I believe is that he plea bargened to avoid those charges and the death penelty. The media these days are very lothe to call somone a terrorist (or anything else) unless they have been convicted. Notice that even in a very clear cut case, the media will always use words like alleged when refering to a criminal. Why is this you ask? To avoid being sued. BTW I saw an article in the washington post where he was called a terrorist, so some of the media is doing it anyway. Well, they were terrorists. So was Rudolph. The guy isn't going to see the light of day again. What more do you want? [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
"Lib'rul" media refuses to call christian terrorist the "T" word
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top