Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Live Birth Abortion is On the Table — America Enters New Stage of Radicalization
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Cirrus" data-source="post: 179799" data-attributes="member: 10493"><p>Much of the live-birth abortion discussion revolves around New York's passage of the "Reproductive Health Act". <a href="https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00240&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y" target="_blank">Click for a link to the bill.</a></p><p></p><p>When you actually read the bill, it's not as bad as the "evil" spin it's getting. Let's break it down.</p><p></p><p>Under the bill, a health care practitioner who is licensed/certified/authorized under NY law may perform an abortion if, in the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment acting within the legal scope of the practitioner's practice, any of the following factors are present in the patient's case: </p><p></p><p>1.) The pregnancy is within the second trimester, or</p><p>2.) The fetus is not viable, or</p><p>3.) The mother will die or the mother's health is at risk.</p><p></p><p>At the outset, we are not talking about an abortion that occurs within the third trimester or just prior to birth despite the spin this law is getting otherwise. The problem with this bill is the presence of "or" among the factors. If it was, pregnancy is within the second trimester <em>and</em> either the fetus is not viable or the mother will die/suffer health complications, then I don't think that there would be as much of an uproar as there is currently. </p><p></p><p>The abortion for "convenience" argument also does not hold as much weight as the spin doctors are giving it. In performing an abortion, the health care practitioner has to use his/her professional judgment using reason and good faith prior to performing the abortion. If a pregnant woman comes into the practitioner's office a week prior to the end of the second trimester and says, "I want an abortion just because I want one", the practitioner should not perform the abortion. If the abortion is performed in such an instance, the practitioner will likely lose his/her license as well as face potential criminal penalties including manslaughter/murder charges. </p><p></p><p>That all being said, I'm against this new law because there is too much gray area.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Cirrus, post: 179799, member: 10493"] Much of the live-birth abortion discussion revolves around New York's passage of the "Reproductive Health Act". [URL='https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00240&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Floor%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y']Click for a link to the bill.[/URL] When you actually read the bill, it's not as bad as the "evil" spin it's getting. Let's break it down. Under the bill, a health care practitioner who is licensed/certified/authorized under NY law may perform an abortion if, in the practitioner's reasonable and good faith professional judgment acting within the legal scope of the practitioner's practice, any of the following factors are present in the patient's case: 1.) The pregnancy is within the second trimester, or 2.) The fetus is not viable, or 3.) The mother will die or the mother's health is at risk. At the outset, we are not talking about an abortion that occurs within the third trimester or just prior to birth despite the spin this law is getting otherwise. The problem with this bill is the presence of "or" among the factors. If it was, pregnancy is within the second trimester [I]and[/I] either the fetus is not viable or the mother will die/suffer health complications, then I don't think that there would be as much of an uproar as there is currently. The abortion for "convenience" argument also does not hold as much weight as the spin doctors are giving it. In performing an abortion, the health care practitioner has to use his/her professional judgment using reason and good faith prior to performing the abortion. If a pregnant woman comes into the practitioner's office a week prior to the end of the second trimester and says, "I want an abortion just because I want one", the practitioner should not perform the abortion. If the abortion is performed in such an instance, the practitioner will likely lose his/her license as well as face potential criminal penalties including manslaughter/murder charges. That all being said, I'm against this new law because there is too much gray area. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Conspiracies & Cover-ups
Live Birth Abortion is On the Table — America Enters New Stage of Radicalization
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top