I wonder about this topic for:
1) There is no historical proof of such a program, contrary to MK or even Arti***, only testimonies whose a large part seem dubious;
2) Nonetheless, a few of those testimonies appear as serious but they point to an international private program, not something managed by a public agency.
This is what I've always thought of Monarch too. I think it's a red herring.
I think there is indeed some kind of a program like this but it's put out
there with either zero proof or the proof being very hard to find.
MKULTRA is a documented fact, Monarch is debatable.
I have noticed that almost all female celebrities are obsessed with
the monarch butterfly but this alone isn't proof and it's used
as proof by proponents of the theory. The theory is basically
that Monarch is different from MKULTRA in that Monarch
is almost exclusively sexual mind control designed to create
beautiful sexy women who will do whatever you want.
Marilyn Monroe was supposedly the first victim, then Britney Spears, Katy Perry
and all the rest. Interestingly Marilyn had a nightmare about her head being cut open,
but this again proves nothing. We need actual documentation as in papers
from the CIA or whoever's doing this and so far none has come forward.