Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Mystery Of Stargates - Gateways Of The Gods
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T" data-source="post: 195115" data-attributes="member: 11605"><p>Hey Opmmur here is some scientific theory you might enjoy.</p><p></p><p>The basic simple premise of a highly theoretical quantum mechanical process that might allow us to fold space.</p><p></p><p>!!!--- DISCLAIMER TO ALL OF THOSE WHOM READ THIS ---!!!</p><p>I am not a properly trained fully qualified Mathematician, Scientist and or Physicist, I am just an amateur theorist. In turn it is because of this that it is extremely important for you to hold all of the scientific theory in which you are about to read as being in 'HIGHLY SUSPECT' of its truth. In fact to tell you the truth there is a good probability that the scientific theory in which you are about to read is wrong. SO CONSULT A PROFESIONAL BEFORE YOU PUT ANY STOCK INTO ITS VALIDITY! *</p><p>---!!! END DISCLAIMER !!!---</p><p></p><p>Before I begin there are 2 things we need to address. First it is to my understanding that while we humans exist inside space we exist outside the subatomic particles which make us what we are. Which theoretically speaking should mean that when we humans look out into space we should be seeing our space dimension from its inside, but when we look at subatomic particles we should be seeing them from their outside. In turn it is because of this I believe that when we humans look at space and or at subatomic particles we are seeing space & subatomic particles from 2 very different dimensional views.</p><p></p><p>Second not only does it take paragraphs upon paragraphs upon paragraphs of all kinds of quantum based dimensional to completely & thoroughly explain all of what it is that I theorize about the process of folding space. But some/all of these paragraphs require the use of all kinds of graphical imagery. At the same time though I do not believe that most people are going to want to read all of this information, nor do I feel like writing it up. In turn it is because of this that I am going to be bypassing all kinds of scientific theory throughout this post. In other words while you are going to be reading the basic simple premise of what it is that I theorize about the process of folding space you are not going to be reading all of what it is that I theorize about this process. So please keep this in mind while you are reading what I've written.</p><p></p><p>So now it is to my understanding that when Scientists and or Physicists look at space not only do they see space as being a positive spacial area but they also see it as being a negative energy density. In turn it is of my belief that our space dimension is not caused by a single instance of energy or quanta. Rather I believe that it is caused by multiple different instances of energy/quanta all in the quantum state of being as a space dimension. At the same time though it is also of my belief that all of the tiny space dimensions which arise from all of these different instances of energy or quanta not only bind together through the action of union or unseparation over the sideways tangent of dimensional separation to construct our space dimension, but I believe that they do so by dimensionally dynamically linking to their 6 neighbors thereby causing our space dimension's physical spacial area to be continuous. In other words & while I believe that our space dimension is caused and or constructed by a digital resolution of multiple different instances of energy/quanta I theorize that all of its energy or quanta causes our space dimension's physical spacial area to be continuous. Of course another way of looking at it here is that I believe as 1 whole thing & all at once our space dimension is a space dimension construct. In that I believe it is a singular space dimension which is constructed by a bunch of smaller space dimensions which all come together through the action of union or unseparation & act as 1 space dimension. Picture a 3 dimensional cross as being 6 outbound directions(or as we know them from inside space left, right, up, down, forwards and backwards) from a single instance of energy or quanta(with the 7th direction as being time/continuum). Then picture multiple different 3 dimensional crosses added together through the action of union or unseparation but where the different sides of these 3 dimensional crosses are ran against each other. The neat thing here is that because of the way that these tiny little space dimensions are said to bind together & because I believe that there are polarities associated with their 6 outbound directions I theorize that the fabric of our space dimension equates to the quantum polarity of zero. At the same time though it is also of my belief that not only do all of these tiny little space dimensions have their own quantum based identities as granted to them by the energy or quanta which causes their physical manifestation, but I also believe that when these tiny little space dimensions dimensionally dynamically link to another tiny space dimension they get quantum identified as doing so. In other words and while I believe that our space dimension is caused & constructed by a digital resolution of multiple different instances of energy or quanta I also believe that it inherits all kinds of quantum physical and or mechanical properties from that energy or quanta.</p><p></p><p>So now I want you to picture a length of space under the numerical context of a meter stick. In that I not only want you to picture each & every single centimeter of a meter stick as being a plank sized space dimension, but I also want you to think of each & every single centimeter's numerical identifier as being the identity of the plank sized space dimension that it represents. At the same time though I want you to imagine that you are at location 27 in our length of space and that you want to get to location 72 in our length of space but you don't want to travel the distance of all of the space dimensions in between. Well one way that you might be able to do this is by identifying location 27's x_right outbound direction to location 72's x_left outbound direction while simultaneously identifying location 28's x_left outbound direction to location 71's x_right outbound direction, move to location 72 and then put everything back to the way that it was. In other words what I'm trying to say here is this. IF the fabric of our space dimension is constructed by a bunch of tiny little plank sized space dimensions & IF these plank sized space dimensions bind together by being dimensionally dynamically linked to each other & IF this dimensionally dynamically linking includes them as being quantum identified as doing so THEN it might be possible to use this quantum identification system to fold space. Of course I don't know if folding space can work in this way, this is just an idea that I have based on what it is that I theorize about how energy or quanta may cause and or construct our space dimension. The neat thing here is that IF folding space can work in this way & IF we can get space and or matter to trigger this THEN we should be able to make something that I call Bidirectional or Fullduplex Dimensional Gate Technology.</p><p></p><p>Do you want to know something funny? Hidden deep inside the meanings of my words is the theoretical idea that as 1 whole thing & all at once our space dimension is a kind of 3 dimensional quantum cubed torus, which from its inside not only appears to have linear spacial area but also appears to be infinite in both size & volume.</p><p></p><p>(* I wanted to find a properly trained fully qualified Mathematician, Scientist and or Physicist to run my scientific thoughts & ideas by before I posted them online for others to see and read. The problem here is that I don't exactly, or should I say no where near, fit within the peer group of the properly educated. Which in turn causes me to think twice about doing this.)</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="Quantum P. Newtonian Am.T, post: 195115, member: 11605"] Hey Opmmur here is some scientific theory you might enjoy. The basic simple premise of a highly theoretical quantum mechanical process that might allow us to fold space. !!!--- DISCLAIMER TO ALL OF THOSE WHOM READ THIS ---!!! I am not a properly trained fully qualified Mathematician, Scientist and or Physicist, I am just an amateur theorist. In turn it is because of this that it is extremely important for you to hold all of the scientific theory in which you are about to read as being in 'HIGHLY SUSPECT' of its truth. In fact to tell you the truth there is a good probability that the scientific theory in which you are about to read is wrong. SO CONSULT A PROFESIONAL BEFORE YOU PUT ANY STOCK INTO ITS VALIDITY! * ---!!! END DISCLAIMER !!!--- Before I begin there are 2 things we need to address. First it is to my understanding that while we humans exist inside space we exist outside the subatomic particles which make us what we are. Which theoretically speaking should mean that when we humans look out into space we should be seeing our space dimension from its inside, but when we look at subatomic particles we should be seeing them from their outside. In turn it is because of this I believe that when we humans look at space and or at subatomic particles we are seeing space & subatomic particles from 2 very different dimensional views. Second not only does it take paragraphs upon paragraphs upon paragraphs of all kinds of quantum based dimensional to completely & thoroughly explain all of what it is that I theorize about the process of folding space. But some/all of these paragraphs require the use of all kinds of graphical imagery. At the same time though I do not believe that most people are going to want to read all of this information, nor do I feel like writing it up. In turn it is because of this that I am going to be bypassing all kinds of scientific theory throughout this post. In other words while you are going to be reading the basic simple premise of what it is that I theorize about the process of folding space you are not going to be reading all of what it is that I theorize about this process. So please keep this in mind while you are reading what I've written. So now it is to my understanding that when Scientists and or Physicists look at space not only do they see space as being a positive spacial area but they also see it as being a negative energy density. In turn it is of my belief that our space dimension is not caused by a single instance of energy or quanta. Rather I believe that it is caused by multiple different instances of energy/quanta all in the quantum state of being as a space dimension. At the same time though it is also of my belief that all of the tiny space dimensions which arise from all of these different instances of energy or quanta not only bind together through the action of union or unseparation over the sideways tangent of dimensional separation to construct our space dimension, but I believe that they do so by dimensionally dynamically linking to their 6 neighbors thereby causing our space dimension's physical spacial area to be continuous. In other words & while I believe that our space dimension is caused and or constructed by a digital resolution of multiple different instances of energy/quanta I theorize that all of its energy or quanta causes our space dimension's physical spacial area to be continuous. Of course another way of looking at it here is that I believe as 1 whole thing & all at once our space dimension is a space dimension construct. In that I believe it is a singular space dimension which is constructed by a bunch of smaller space dimensions which all come together through the action of union or unseparation & act as 1 space dimension. Picture a 3 dimensional cross as being 6 outbound directions(or as we know them from inside space left, right, up, down, forwards and backwards) from a single instance of energy or quanta(with the 7th direction as being time/continuum). Then picture multiple different 3 dimensional crosses added together through the action of union or unseparation but where the different sides of these 3 dimensional crosses are ran against each other. The neat thing here is that because of the way that these tiny little space dimensions are said to bind together & because I believe that there are polarities associated with their 6 outbound directions I theorize that the fabric of our space dimension equates to the quantum polarity of zero. At the same time though it is also of my belief that not only do all of these tiny little space dimensions have their own quantum based identities as granted to them by the energy or quanta which causes their physical manifestation, but I also believe that when these tiny little space dimensions dimensionally dynamically link to another tiny space dimension they get quantum identified as doing so. In other words and while I believe that our space dimension is caused & constructed by a digital resolution of multiple different instances of energy or quanta I also believe that it inherits all kinds of quantum physical and or mechanical properties from that energy or quanta. So now I want you to picture a length of space under the numerical context of a meter stick. In that I not only want you to picture each & every single centimeter of a meter stick as being a plank sized space dimension, but I also want you to think of each & every single centimeter's numerical identifier as being the identity of the plank sized space dimension that it represents. At the same time though I want you to imagine that you are at location 27 in our length of space and that you want to get to location 72 in our length of space but you don't want to travel the distance of all of the space dimensions in between. Well one way that you might be able to do this is by identifying location 27's x_right outbound direction to location 72's x_left outbound direction while simultaneously identifying location 28's x_left outbound direction to location 71's x_right outbound direction, move to location 72 and then put everything back to the way that it was. In other words what I'm trying to say here is this. IF the fabric of our space dimension is constructed by a bunch of tiny little plank sized space dimensions & IF these plank sized space dimensions bind together by being dimensionally dynamically linked to each other & IF this dimensionally dynamically linking includes them as being quantum identified as doing so THEN it might be possible to use this quantum identification system to fold space. Of course I don't know if folding space can work in this way, this is just an idea that I have based on what it is that I theorize about how energy or quanta may cause and or construct our space dimension. The neat thing here is that IF folding space can work in this way & IF we can get space and or matter to trigger this THEN we should be able to make something that I call Bidirectional or Fullduplex Dimensional Gate Technology. Do you want to know something funny? Hidden deep inside the meanings of my words is the theoretical idea that as 1 whole thing & all at once our space dimension is a kind of 3 dimensional quantum cubed torus, which from its inside not only appears to have linear spacial area but also appears to be infinite in both size & volume. (* I wanted to find a properly trained fully qualified Mathematician, Scientist and or Physicist to run my scientific thoughts & ideas by before I posted them online for others to see and read. The problem here is that I don't exactly, or should I say no where near, fit within the peer group of the properly educated. Which in turn causes me to think twice about doing this.) [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Time Travel Forum
Time Travel Discussion
Mystery Of Stargates - Gateways Of The Gods
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top