Menu
Forums
New posts
Search forums
What's new
New posts
New profile posts
Latest activity
Vault
Time Travel Schematics
T.E.C. Time Archive
The Why Files
Have You Seen...?
Chronovisor
TimeTravelForum.tk
TimeTravelForum.net
ParanormalNetwork.net
Paranormalis.com
ConspiracyCafe.net
Streams
Live streams
Featured streams
Multi-Viewer
Members
Current visitors
New profile posts
Search profile posts
Log in
Register
What's new
Search
Search
Search titles only
By:
New posts
Search forums
Menu
Log in
Register
Navigation
Install the app
Install
More options
Contact us
Close Menu
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
JavaScript is disabled. For a better experience, please enable JavaScript in your browser before proceeding.
You are using an out of date browser. It may not display this or other websites correctly.
You should upgrade or use an
alternative browser
.
Reply to thread
Message
<blockquote data-quote="systemoftheuniverse" data-source="post: 28535" data-attributes="member: 597"><p><strong>Re: new theory...</strong></p><p></p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"thenumbersix\")</div></p><p> </p><p>The expanding universe...so gravity is caused by matter expanding, witch causes some unexplained resistance. But wouldn't that mean that other energies have to mysteriously multiply to equal the gap created by expansion. Or is energy just mysteriously growing to force this expanding universe. </p><p> </p><p><div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"thenumbersix\")</div></p><p> </p><p>neutrons and elctrons are opposites. But then there is a third and equal opposite,.. witch is electrons. But wiat, there might be a forth opposite,.. antimatter witch follows no ordinary order. </p><p> </p><p>Yet you say that anti-matter has three elements, witch are equal and opposite energies to ;protons, neutrons, and electrons. Yet antimatter has been found in how many forms??? Obviously the way antimatter has been found doesn't allow us to study it... only because it acts differently then the three opposites we do know of; electrons, neutrons, and protons. </p><p> </p><p>Where are the three different definitions of antimatter? At least in theory you say they are possiable,.. but how are they possiable. Anti matter acts one way we know of. Pertaining no stability that we could study it. Yet that is the exact opposite to the three things we do know.</p><p> </p><p>the only real way to compare; electrons, neutrons, and protons is by definition. Numbers just explain how much this definition takes place.</p><p></p><p>and by numbers we see how much; electrons, neutrons, and protons react. But just like an X and Y axis grid there is the equal and opposite X and Y grid defined by negatives, antimatter still cannot be possiable concieved into a relative definition of your theory.</p><p></p><p>burdon of proof.</p></blockquote><p></p>
[QUOTE="systemoftheuniverse, post: 28535, member: 597"] [b]Re: new theory...[/b] <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"thenumbersix\")</div> The expanding universe...so gravity is caused by matter expanding, witch causes some unexplained resistance. But wouldn't that mean that other energies have to mysteriously multiply to equal the gap created by expansion. Or is energy just mysteriously growing to force this expanding universe. <div class='quotetop'>QUOTE(\"thenumbersix\")</div> neutrons and elctrons are opposites. But then there is a third and equal opposite,.. witch is electrons. But wiat, there might be a forth opposite,.. antimatter witch follows no ordinary order. Yet you say that anti-matter has three elements, witch are equal and opposite energies to ;protons, neutrons, and electrons. Yet antimatter has been found in how many forms??? Obviously the way antimatter has been found doesn't allow us to study it... only because it acts differently then the three opposites we do know of; electrons, neutrons, and protons. Where are the three different definitions of antimatter? At least in theory you say they are possiable,.. but how are they possiable. Anti matter acts one way we know of. Pertaining no stability that we could study it. Yet that is the exact opposite to the three things we do know. the only real way to compare; electrons, neutrons, and protons is by definition. Numbers just explain how much this definition takes place. and by numbers we see how much; electrons, neutrons, and protons react. But just like an X and Y axis grid there is the equal and opposite X and Y grid defined by negatives, antimatter still cannot be possiable concieved into a relative definition of your theory. burdon of proof. [/QUOTE]
Insert quotes…
Verification
Post reply
Forums
Paranormal Forum
Philosophy, Metaphysics & the Afterlife
new theory...
This site uses cookies to help personalise content, tailor your experience and to keep you logged in if you register.
By continuing to use this site, you are consenting to our use of cookies.
Accept
Learn more…
Top